CLASS ACTION UPDATE for TEUM, ZEN and GRUB: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Investors of Class Actions on Behalf of Shareholders

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 17, 2019 / Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that class action lawsuits have commenced on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies. Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiff have until the deadlines listed to petition the court. Further details about the cases can be found at the links provided. There is no cost or obligation to you.

TEUM Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/pareteum-corporation-loss-form?prid=4928&wire=1
ZEN Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/zendesk-inc-loss-form?prid=4928&wire=1
GRUB Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/grubhub-inc-loss-form?prid=4928&wire=1

* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BELOW *

Pareteum Corporation (NASDAQ:TEUM)

TEUM Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased December 14, 2017 – October 21, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : December 23, 2019
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/pareteum-corporation-loss-form?prid=4928&wire=1

According to the filed complaint, during the class period, Pareteum Corporation made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) it was not true that the Company's purported success was the result of hyper-demand for Pareteum's unique products or exceptional service, or the Company's competent management; but, in fact, Defendants had propped up the Company's results by manipulating Pareteum's accounting for revenues, income, and the important Backlog metric; (b) Defendants had materially overstated the Company's profitability by failing to properly account for the Company's results of operations and by artificially inflating the Company's financial results; (c) it was not true that Pareteum contained even the most minimally adequate systems of internal operational or financial controls necessary to assure that Pareteum's reported financial statements were true, accurate, and/or reliable; (d) as a result, it also was not true that the Company's financial statements and reports were prepared in accordance with GAAP and SEC rules; and (e) as a result of the aforementioned adverse conditions, Defendants lacked any reasonable basis to claim that Pareteum was operating according to plan, or that Pareteum could achieve the guidance sponsored and/or endorsed by Defendants.

Zendesk, Inc. (NYSE:ZEN)

ZEN Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased February 6, 2019 – October 1, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : December 23, 2019
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/zendesk-inc-loss-form?prid=4928&wire=1

According to the filed complaint, during the class period, Zendesk, Inc. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) Zendesk's clients had been subject to data breaches dating back to 2016; (b) Zendesk was experiencing slowing demand for its Software as a Service offerings, particularly in Germany, the United Kingdom, and Australia, due in large part to political uncertainty and China trade issues there; and (c) as a result of the foregoing, Zendesk's business metrics and financial prospects were not as strong as defendants had led the market to believe during the Class Period.

Grubhub Inc. (NYSE:GRUB)

GRUB Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased July 30, 2019 – October 28, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : January 20, 2020
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/grubhub-inc-loss-form?prid=4928&wire=1

According to the filed complaint, during the class period, Grubhub Inc. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) customer orders were actually declining, despite the massive investments that the Company had made to spur demand for and use of its platform; (ii) Grubhub's new customer additions were generating significantly lower revenues as compared to historic cohorts because these customers were more prone to using competitor platforms; (iii) Grubhub's vaunted business model under which it secured exclusive partnerships had failed, and Grubhub needed to engage in the same aggressive nonpartnered sales tactics embraced by its competitors to generate significant revenue growth; (iv) Grubhub was required to spend substantial additional capital in order to grow revenues and retain market share in the face of heightened competitive dynamics and market saturation, eviscerating the Company's profitability; and (v) Grubhub was tracking tens of millions of dollars below its revenue and earnings guidance and such guidance lacked any reasonable basis.

You have until the lead plaintiff deadlines to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm's attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
55 Broadway, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10006
jlevi@levikorsinsky.com
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171
www.zlk.com

SOURCE: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP

ReleaseID: 570574