Leading Criminal Defense Attorney Edward La Rue Talks About Defending A Charge In A Self-Defense Case – Cleveland, OH
In a recent interview, top-rated criminal lawyer Edward La Rue, founding partner of the Law Offices of Edward R. La Rue in Cleveland, OH, describes how a charge is defended during a self-defense case. For more information please visit https://www.edwardrlarue.com
Cleveland, OH, United States – January 29, 2021 /MM-REB/ —
In a recent interview, top-rated criminal lawyer Edward La Rue, founding partner of the Law Offices of Edward R. La Rue in Cleveland, OH, explained how a charge is defended during a self-defense case.
For more information please visit https://www.edwardrlarue.com
When asked for a comment, he said, “It’s the right of every citizen to assert a self-defense claim when accused of causing physical harm to another person that was threatening harm to that citizen. While self-defense – which is the right to repel force or violence by defending oneself with a reasonable and proportionate level of force or violence in one’s own defense – that may seem simple enough in definition, but becomes considerably more complicated in real-life situations.”
La Rue was quick to add that each state has its own set of rules and regulations to identify whether or not self-defense is permitted in certain situations. However, there are certain commonalities among all states, as outlined below.
First, it’s important to establish whether or not the threat, in a self-defense case scenario, was imminent in the first place.
“To justify using force, the threat needs to have been immediate. And this can come in several forms, such as a verbal threat. It’s also important to know that the threat must still be present. So, for instance, let’s say that someone was a victim of an assault by an assailant. If that assault ended and there was no more immediate danger, then any violence used against the aggressor would be considered retaliatory instead of self-defense,” he said.
According to La Rue, it’s also vital to show that a fear of harm was reasonable as part of a self-defense case.
When asked to elaborate, he said, “What many people might not realize is that self-defense can be justified even if an aggressor didn’t intend to cause harm to the victim. In a case like this, we look at whether or not a ‘reasonable person’ would have also perceived there to be an immediate threat of danger of harm to themselves or another.”
Following this, La Rue also pointed out that the violence used in a self-defense case must be proportionate to the threat.
“What this really boils down to is whether the response to a threat was in proportion to the level of perceived danger. This means that a person in a self-defense case can only use as much violence as is required to eliminate the threat. A self-defense claim would be unsuccessful if a person uses deadly force that could lead to bodily harm or death when the initial threat of harm was minor,” he explained.
“While these are just a few of the factors that are to be considered a self-defense case, it requires many more moving parts to mount a successful defense. To learn more about what can be done in your particular case, make sure to contact an experienced criminal defense attorney,” he said.
Source: http://RecommendedExperts.biz
Contact Info:
Name: Edward R. La Rue
Email: Send Email
Organization: Law Offices of Edward R La Rue
Address: The Rockefeller Building, 614 W Superior Ave, Cleveland, OH 44113
Phone: (216) 600-0663
Website: https://www.edwardrlarue.com
Source: MM-REB
Release ID: 88994565