Blog Coverage German and UK Courts Rule in Favor of Boston Scientifics’ Patent Related Litigation with Edwards Lifesciences
Upcoming AWS Coverage on Nevro Post-Earnings Results
LONDON, UK / ACCESSWIRE / March 10, 2017 / Active Wall St. blog coverage looks at the headline from Boston Scientific Corp. (NYSE: BSX) as the Company announced on March 09, 2017, that the German District Court of Düsseldorf had concluded that Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE: EW) and its German subsidiary Edwards Lifesciences Services GmbH’s Sapien 3™ heart valve infringed on two patents of Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. related to adaptive sealing technology. Register with us now for your free membership and blog access at:
http://www.activewallst.com/register/
One of Boston Scientific’s competitors within the Medical Appliances & Equipment space, Nevro Corp. (NYSE: NVRO), reported on February 23, 2017, its financial results for the three months and full year ended December 31, 2016. AWS will be initiating a research report on Nevro in the coming days.
Today, AWS is promoting its blog coverage on BSX and EW; touching on NRVO. Get all of our free blog coverage and more by clicking on the link below:
http://www.activewallst.com/register/
Commenting on the ruling, Tim Pratt, Executive V.P., Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary of Boston Scientific said:
“We are pleased with the progress we are making with litigation in Europe, and believe the strength of our intellectual property will also be upheld in US cases involving the same patents.”
Rulings by the Court in Germany
The German Court ruled that the infringement was specific to two German parts of the Sapien 3™ heart valve – EP 2 749 254 B1 and EP 2 926 766 B1. The German Court also ruled that Boston and its German subsidiary did not infringe on Edwards ‘ German part EP 1 441 672 B1 but did infringe on Edwards ‘ German part EP 2 399 550 B1. However, Boston is confident that the European Patent Office (EPO) will revoke the patent on EP 2 399 550 B1.
The patents are related to Boston’s Lotus™ Valve System. The Lotus Valve System is used for aortic valve replacement in those patients who have severe aortic stenosis (Aortic stenosis is a narrowing of the aortic valve opening) and who are considered high risk for surgery for valve replacement. The replacement valve is put in place using transcatheter percutaneous delivery method, thus avoiding open heart surgery altogether. Transcatheter percutaneous delivery is also known as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), is the replacement of the aortic valve of the heart through the blood vessels as opposed to valve replacement by open heart surgery.
Boston’s Lotus Valve Adaptive Seal™ technology creates an external seal that prevents any leakage outside the valve. The seal is very critical and has the ability to influence the mortality of the patients’.
Both Boston and Edwards have the option to appeal against the German Courts ruling. Interestingly the battleground has also expanded as both Companies have opposed each other’s patents at the European Patent Office (EPO).
Rulings by the Court in UK
On March 03, 2017, the Patents Court in UK ruled on Edwards’ lawsuit against Boston alleging that the European patent on repositionable heart valve owned by Boston’s subsidiary is invalid. The UK Court gave a mixed ruling and noted that one of Boston’s patents related to the outer seals for transcatheter heart valve is invalid but the second patent is valid and Edwards has infringed on the same.
About the multi-location litigation, claims, and counter claims
Boston was the first to file a lawsuit, and below are the claims and counter claims:
October 30, 2015 – Boston’s subsidiary files a suit against Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and Edwards Lifesciences Services GmbH in Düsseldorf District Court in Germany alleging that Edwards’ SAPIEN 3 heart valve infringes on Boston’s patent related to adaptive sealing technology.
November 09, 2015 – Edwards Lifesciences, LLC files a case against Boston’s subsidiary Sadra Medical, Inc., in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division Patents Court, UK. Edwards claimed that the European patent on repositionable heart valve owned by Sadra is invalid. In reply to this, Boston made a counter claim on January 15, 2016 that the European patent is valid and Edwards had infringed on it.
November 23, 2015 – Edwards Lifesciences PVT, Inc. files a patent infringement action against Boston’s subsidiary Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH, in the District Court of Düsseldorf, Germany. Edwards alleged that Boston Scientific’s Lotus™ transcatheter heart valve system infringes on European patent on Spenser owned by Edwards.
November 23, 2015 – Edwards Lifesciences Corporation files a patent infringement case against Boston and its subsidiary Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH in the District Court of Düsseldorf, Germany. The suit alleges that Boston Scientific’s Lotus™ transcatheter heart valve system infringes on European patent on Bourang owned by Edwards.
With so many suits involving multiple patents and venues, Boston is likely to be engaged in various Courts for a long time. Edwards plans to appeal against the decisions by the German and UK Courts and feels that in the end the Company will be victorious.
In February 2017, Boston voluntarily withdrew its Lotus™ heart valves from the market citing mechanical issues as the reason. Currently, it is not available commercially for sale in the market.
In parallel, Edwards Lifesciences has assured its customers that the SAPIEN 3 valve will continue to be available commercially. It also continues to maintain its financial guidance for FY17.
Stock Performance
Boston Scientific’s share price finished yesterday’s trading session at $24.69, marginally advancing 0.69%. A total volume of 5.85 million shares exchanged hands. The stock has rallied 18.64% and 41.73% in the last three months and past twelve months, respectively. Furthermore, since the start of the year, shares of the Company have surged 14.15%. At Thursday’s closing price, the stock’s net capitalization stands at $33.69 billion.
Edwards Lifesciences’ stock, on the other hand, jumped 3.94% on March 09, 2017, and closed at $93.06. Approximately, 3.83 million shares exchanged hands by the end of the day’s trading. The stock has advanced 2.59% and 11.82% in the last 30 days and 90 days respectively. The stock’s yearly performance was 8.52% as compared to its year-to-date performance of negative 0.68%. The stock has a PE ratio of 35.60 and a market capital of $19.97 billion.
Active Wall Street:
Active Wall Street (AWS) produces regular sponsored and non-sponsored reports, articles, stock market blogs, and popular investment newsletters covering equities listed on NYSE and NASDAQ and micro-cap stocks. AWS has two distinct and independent departments. One department produces non-sponsored analyst certified content generally in the form of press releases, articles and reports covering equities listed on NYSE and NASDAQ and the other produces sponsored content (in most cases not reviewed by a registered analyst), which typically consists of compensated investment newsletters, articles and reports covering listed stocks and micro-caps. Such sponsored content is outside the scope of procedures detailed below.
AWS has not been compensated; directly or indirectly; for producing or publishing this document.
PRESS RELEASE PROCEDURES:
The non-sponsored content contained herein has been prepared by a writer (the “Author”) and is fact checked and reviewed by a third party research service company (the “Reviewer”) represented by a credentialed financial analyst, for further information on analyst credentials, please email info@activewallst.com. Rohit Tuli, a CFA® charterholder (the “Sponsor”), provides necessary guidance in preparing the document templates. The Reviewer has reviewed and revised the content, as necessary, based on publicly available information which is believed to be reliable. Content is researched, written and reviewed on a reasonable-effort basis. The Reviewer has not performed any independent investigations or forensic audits to validate the information herein. The Reviewer has only independently reviewed the information provided by the Author according to the procedures outlined by AWS. AWS is not entitled to veto or interfere in the application of such procedures by the third-party research service company to the articles, documents or reports, as the case may be. Unless otherwise noted, any content outside of this document has no association with the Author or the Reviewer in any way.
NO WARRANTY
AWS, the Author, and the Reviewer are not responsible for any error which may be occasioned at the time of printing of this document or any error, mistake or shortcoming. No liability is accepted whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from the use of this document. AWS, the Author, and the Reviewer expressly disclaim any fiduciary responsibility or liability for any consequences, financial or otherwise arising from any reliance placed on the information in this document. Additionally, AWS, the Author, and the Reviewer do not (1) guarantee the accuracy, timeliness, completeness or correct sequencing of the information, or (2) warrant any results from use of the information. The included information is subject to change without notice.
NOT AN OFFERING
This document is not intended as an offering, recommendation, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned or discussed, and is to be used for informational purposes only. Please read all associated disclosures and disclaimers in full before investing. Neither AWS nor any party affiliated with us is a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer with any agency or in any jurisdiction whatsoever. To download our report(s), read our disclosures, or for more information, visit http://www.activewallst.com/disclaimer/.
CONTACT
For any questions, inquiries, or comments reach out to us directly. If you’re a company we are covering and wish to no longer feature on our coverage list contact us via email and/or phone between 09:30 EDT to 16:00 EDT from Monday to Friday at:
Email: info@activewallst.com
Phone number: 1-858-257-3144
Office Address: 3rd floor, 207 Regent Street, London, W1B 3HH, United Kingdom
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
SOURCE: Active Wall Street
ReleaseID: 456988