Monthly Archives: June 2016

Jonathan Roberts Auction House Of Phoenix, AZ – Much Better Than Consignment

June 23, 2016 – – Troy Warren, host of LetsTalkBusinessRadio.Com interviewed Jonathan Rarig about the opening of Jonathan Roberts Auction House coming up in July, 2016.

Warren noticed that the Jonathan Roberts Auction House promised to be much better than traditional consignment so he reached out to Jonathan Rarig one of the companies executives for comment.

Jonathan Roberts Auction House Phoenix AZ

Troy Warren asked, “Jonathan when is the official open date of the Jonathan Roberts Auction House?”

Jonathan Rarig: “We’re doing a soft launch on July 8, 2016, and the official GRAND OPENING is July 15, 2016. The public is welcome even during the soft launch.”

Warren asked, “What is the difference between traditional consignment and the Jonathan Roberts Auction House?”

Jonathan Rarig: “Both provide a service to those in transition, (for whatever reason it may be) and strive to be a solution oriented business. The Auction process is much different than traditional ‘brick & mortar’ consignment. The most glaring is the selling price. In the traditional ‘brick & mortar’ consignment process the sellers (us) gets to set pricing and with the auction process the opposite is what occurs; in an auction the buyers set the selling price through open cry. This means we never know what price any item will sell for … the same item could sell for $20 or $200, it is different each and every time.”

Warren commented, “I know there is your website at http://www.JRAuctionHouse.com, but is there a physical location that people can come visit?”

Jonathan Rarig: “Yes. 12631 North 48th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85032 … across the street from the Paradise Valley Mall at the southern most end of the Best Buy building, around the corner from Kids Park.”

Rarig mentioned, “We’re partnered with ‘invaluable’ the world’s leading on-line marketplace for fine art, antiques and collectibles. They have 3 million unique visitors monthly and they have a global reach with offices in UK, France, Belgium, Germany & Australia. In addition we also have a partnership with AuctionZip, the world’s largest online auction marketplace with over 13 million auction buyers. Because of this, we have the ability to reach millions of people worldwide with our auctions.”

Warren commented, “Thank you Jonathan and I look forward to seeing your new concept add much more value than traditional consignment.”

###

Contact LTBR:

Troy Warren
480-720-5478
troy@letstalkbusinessradio.com

ReleaseID: 60010993

FAA Report Reveals Shocking Aviation Safety Findings

Shocking_Aviation_Safety_Findings_Final.jpg

New York City, NY, 06/23/2016 /SubmitPressRelease123/

New York – Following the media’s release of reports on the latest developments in the case of a JetBlue pilot accused of flying while under the influence of alcohol, New York aviation lawyer Jonathan C. Reiter has issued new commentary about aviation safety. In the publication “JetBlue Pilot Accused of Flying While Under the Influence Facing Federal Charges” the attorney highlights shocking findings contained in an FAA report that among other things shows the surprising rate at which pilots are caught attempting to fly aircraft while under the influence.

What FAA Records Reveal About Alcohol and Drug Violations Among Pilots

According to a Fox News report released in April, FAA records show that in 2015, more than 1,500 personnel, including 38 pilots,who are charged with ensuring airline safety tested positive for illegal substances. Between 2010 and 2015, 64 pilots received citations for alcohol and drug provision violations. Peter Bartos, a retired military pilot with an FAA Airline Transport Pilot license, who reviewed the FAA data for the Fox News report is quoted by the news source as stating “It is mind-boggling that on average one U.S. pilot a month is caught trying to fly a passenger aircraft while over the legal limit for flying, which at 0.04 percent, is more restrictive than for driving a car in many states, especially given that they know they are subject to screening.”

Bartos further notes, “According to FAA data, there is no leveling off or decrease in this trend, in fact drug use seems to be climbing…The general public probably has no idea that this abuse is occurring with such regularity at certain airlines.”

Although Lynn Lunsford, Mid-States Public Affairs Manager for the Federal Aviation Administration, has said that the numbers are relatively low considering how many tests are performed annually, New York attorney Jonathan C. Reiter of the Jonathan C. Reiter Law Firm PLLC says there is no excuse for any number of willful violations of this type being committed by pilots asserting, “these numbers are high enough to arouse legitimate concern among the flying public. It is also important to point out that the statistics don’t count the number of pilots whose bad practices fly under the radar because they are not among those chosen for random testing.”

The New York aviation lawyer, who has represented clients in a number of cases against airlines like JetBlue involving FAA violations, says in his recent publication “it is important when these types of behaviors are uncovered that immediate action is taken to help keep passengers safe, and hold airlines accountable so that they tighten protocol for pre-screening pilots and monitoring their behavior.”

About Aviation Lawyer Jonathan C. Reiter

Attorney Jonathan C. Reiter is a renowned New York based aviation lawyer who handles high profile personal injury cases and frequently commentates on key legal matters related to the aviation industry.

To read more of the report, “JetBlue Pilot Accused of Flying While Under the Influence Facing Federal Charges” or to get answers to questions about the Jonathan C. Reiter Law Firm PLLC, visit http://injuryaccidentnews.jcreiterlaw.com/.

Media Contact:

Jonathan C. Reiter Law Firm, PLLC

646-863-8172

http://injuryaccidentnews.jcreiterlaw.com/

Connect with the Jonathan C. Reiter, PLLC law firm on Facebook, Twitter

Hear the New York aviation attorney’s legal perspective on recent aviation cases via YouTube.

Like Us on Facebook

Read the full story at http://newsreleases.submitpressrelease123.com/2016/06/23/new-york-aviation-lawyer-faa-report-reveals-shocking-aviation-safety-findings/

ReleaseID: 19905

New York Aviation Attorney Weighs in on Debate Over Airline Security Issues

Airline_Security_Issues_Final.jpg

New York City, NY, 06/23/2016 /SubmitPressRelease123/

New York – As the public continues to witness the ongoing debate between airlines and transportation safety advocates over aviation security concerns, New York aviation attorney Jonathan C. Reiter has released a publication discussing the responsibility of airlines to ensure that proper safety measures are in place for flyers. According to recent news reports, well known U.S. airlines are attempting to point the finger at Congress for security screening issues that have garnered complaints from passengers. In the publication “Airlines Attempt to Blame Congress for Air Travel Security Screening Issues,” attorney Jonathan C. Reiter discusses the criticism and concerns over whether it is indicative of potential problems with airlines refusing to implement needed protocol to protect the flying public due to the anticipation of higher related costs down the road.

The Frequency of Airport Security Lapses

As mentioned in the New York aviation lawyer’s publication, security lapses in airports occur with more frequency than what is commonly known by the general public. Citing a Los Angeles Daily News report, the publication quotes the writer of the article “Airport security lapses frequent” as stating “An Associated Press investigation found 268 perimeter breaches since 2004 at airports that together handle three-quarters of U.S. commercial passenger traffic. And that’s an undercount, because two airports among the 31 that AP surveyed didn’t have data for all years.”

Following a recent move by the U.S. Senate to approve new security rules, airports have begun expressing issues with costs associated with needed improvements, with one trade group even recommending that Congress budget funding for required measures. Attorney Jonathan C. Reiter asserts in his article that airlines should place more focus on what needs to be done as opposed to the dramatics surrounding their financial fears stating “rather than pointing fingers and making excuses for any shortcomings, airports and airlines should evaluate their current processes for keeping passengers safe and focus their attention on how they can best actively take steps to comply with laws and regulations.”

Attorney Jonathan C. Reiter is a prominent New York based aviation lawyer who has handled numerous high profile personal injury cases and frequently commentates on key legal matters related to the aviation industry. To read more of the attorney’s insight about the debate in the report, “Airlines Attempt to Blame Congress for Air Travel Security Screening Issues” or to get answers to questions about the Jonathan C. Reiter Law Firm PLLC, visit http://injuryaccidentnews.jcreiterlaw.com/.

Media Contact:

Jonathan C. Reiter Law Firm, PLLC

646-863-8172

http://injuryaccidentnews.jcreiterlaw.com/

Connect with the Jonathan C. Reiter, PLLC law firm on Facebook, Twitter

Hear the New York aviation attorney’s legal perspective on recent aviation cases via YouTube.

Like Us on Facebook

Read the full story at http://newsreleases.submitpressrelease123.com/2016/06/23/new-york-aviation-attorney-weighs-in-on-debate-over-airline-security-issues/

ReleaseID: 19908

Texas truck accident lawyer Attorney Amy Witherite reviews The 1976 Houston Ammonia Truck Disaster.

The_Scariest_Moment_in_Houston_s_History.jpg

Dallas, 06/23/2016 /SubmitPressRelease123/

At approximately 11 o’clock in the morning on a bright sunny day, drivers at the interchange of the Southwest Freeway and the 610 West Loop became the victims of the worst truck disaster in Houston’s history.

Texas leading truck accident lawyer Attorney Amy Witherite reviews The 1976 Houston Ammonia Truck Disaster.

On this date, a commercial tanker driven by William Gregory Schmidt, 28, carrying over 7,000 gallons of pressurized anhydrous ammonia crashed into and through the barrier, falling down onto the freeway below. The ensuing release of ammonia gas resulted in the death of six others besides the driver of the truck. This horrific accident also led to a number of changes in laws regarding the construction of tanker trailers as well as speed limits for chemical haulers, and the construction of barricades.

Source ABC News Channel 13 KTRK: “The Worst Accident in Houston History: The 1976 Ammonia Truck Disaster”

” HOUSTON (KTRK) — It was the worst accident in Houston history. On May 11, 1976, at 11:08 in the morning, a tank truck carrying 7500 gallons of anhydrous ammonia lost control, crashed through a guardrail and careened off a ramp to the freeway below.”

To read the report, visit: http://abc13.com/news/a-look-back-40-years-after-the-worst-accident-in-houston-history/1332062/

The Scariest Moment in Houston’s History

This accident is considered to be one of the “scariest” moments in the city’s long history. By the time it was all over, a total of six people died either at the scene or in nearby hospitals. However, there was one more fatality three years later. This was Karen Bijak, 27, a former beauty queen who would die in 1979 from health complications as a result of exposure to the fumes.

Along with the seven fatalities, another 178 people were injured as a result of ammonia fume inhalation and direct contact with the fumes.  Of these, 78 were deemed critical and admitted to the hospital for extended treatments, the other 100 were treated and released.

How the Accident Unfolded

According to witnesses, the truck driven by Schmidt appeared to hit the barrier on the overpass and then proceeded to topple over it. The truck and trailer then plummeted onto the freeway below, slamming into one of the support columns. The trailer broke into two sections, releasing a huge cloud of ammonia vapor that could be seen from miles away.

The victims in cars who were engulfed by the fumes were overcome, causing some to crash. All fatalities were listed as a direct result of ammonia fume inhalation. Many managed to move far enough away from the scene that they were able to get clear of the cloud, others were not so lucky, including one man who tried to duck into a culvert to find fresh air only to be completely overwhelmed by the fumes.

Other victims also included the many motorists who stopped their own vehicles and attempted to aid those who were already overcome by fumes, several members of the emergency response teams, and several members of the press covering the accident.

What the NTSB Investigation Found

Anytime there is an accident of this magnitude, the NTSB (National Traffic Safety Board) conducts an investigation in an effort to determine the cause. Since the driver of the tractor-trailer combination died at the time of the accident, the investigators had to rely on eyewitness reports and evidence gathered from the scene.

The driver of an automobile in front of the truck driven by Schmidt stated that she noticed it was following her at several car length’s distance. She noted that her speedometer indicated she was traveling at 59 mph and that she accelerated to 70 mph in order to facilitate a lane change to the right, but the truck kept up with her pace.

Both vehicles exited from I-610 onto the connector ramp that would take them to the Southwest Freeway.  The driver stated she exited to the right while the truck exited to the left. At the time, the driver of the car stated she was driving at approximately 40 to 45 mph and that the truck appeared to be going approximately 55 to 60 mph.

As the truck proceeded into the curve and out onto the bridge, it appeared to roll and strike the curb. The tractor-trailer then struck the concrete and steel tubing of the barrier and kept going, breaking through both with ease. It then plunged off the overpass and fell approximately 15 feet onto the freeway below. At this point the combination also struck one of the support pillars for the overpass seriously damaging it.

Source NTSB Highway Accident Report NTSB – HAR-77-1

About 11.08 a.m., on May 11, 1976, a Transport Company of Texas tractor-semi trailer (tank) transporting 7,509 gallons of anhydrous ammonia struck and penetrated a bridge rail on a ramp connecting I-610 with the Southwest Freeway (U.S. 59) in Houston, Texas.

To read the entire report, visit: ttp://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAR7701.pdf

High Number of Injuries

At the point of impact, the sudden release of the pressurized anhydrous ammonia (an industrial strength cleaning agent) created what can only be described as an explosion that destroyed the tractor and trailer. A total of twelve vehicles in the immediate vicinity of the accident were damaged by flying debris, of these four were subjected to severe damage.

Injuries to Persons

Injuries

Drivers

Passengers

Others

Fatal

4

2

0

Nonfatal

20

12

146

None

0

0

Courtesy NTSB – HAR-77-1

All injuries with the exception of the driver of the truck were caused by the release of the ammonia gas as a result of the accident. According to the records, there were approximately 500 people located within a 1/4-mile radius of the accident at the time.

Cause of the Accident Determined

The NTSB investigation determined that several factors came into play related directly to the cause of the accident. The transmission of the truck was found to be in ninth gear helping to corroborate the testimony of the driver who stated she thought that it was traveling between 55 and 60 mph. While the right-hand side of the exit ramp had a posted warning sign indicating a maximum recommended exit speed of 40 mph, the left side was not posted.

However, all information garnered from the truck, including a pyrometer needle stuck in the “red range” indicated the truck was most likely traveling at 5.36 mph, too fast for the truck to safely negotiate the curve with less than a full tank. The tank was only filled to 71.8 percent of its total capacity. This led investigators to believe that the lateral surge of the load, which occurred when the truck struck the curb, caused the truck and trailer to begin overturning. Once in motion, the truck could not be stopped and it continued through the barrier and onto the freeway below.  

Finally, the NTSB report noted that the guardrail system in use on this section of the overpass was “of an outdated design” and was only intended to prevent automobiles from being able to penetrate it. Thus, instead of redirecting the truck back out onto the road, stopping it from penetrating the guardrail, the truck crashed through the barricade and onto the freeway below.  

Recommendations that Resulted from these Findings

The NTSB sent a recommendation to the Federal Highway Administration (Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety) that they should carefully investigate the problem of overturn stability that can result from the surge of liquid cargoes in all partially loaded tractor-trailer combinations.  The idea behind this being to find ways via Federal regulation to design tank trailers in such a manner as to reduce or eliminate the effects of the liquid surge.

At the same time, a recommendation was sent to the Department of Transportation that they initiate research into ways to reduce the risks of injury and damage resulting from this type of accident.

Changes and New Laws

Accidents such as this one have led to many changes in the law designed to protect the general public from these types of accidents and to reduce the amount of collateral damage. Among the changes are new tank trailer designs that include partitions and/or baffles designed to reduce or eliminate the type of liquid surge that contributed heavily to the overturning of the tractor-trailer combination.

Changes in the design of overpass guardrails and the materials used to build them have also been instituted. These new designs must be able to redirect the full weight of all vehicles, including tractor-trailers, back onto the road instead of allowing them to penetrate and tumble onto the road below.

If both of these recommendations had already been in place prior to this horrific accident in May of 1976, the number of injuries and fatalities would likely have been significantly lessened, if not completely eliminated. Since the accident, barriers and guardrails across the country have been updated and improved to significantly to reduce the possibility that buses and commercial trucks, including those weighing up to 80,000 pounds, will penetrate them resulting in similar situations.

Finally, as proof that these changes to the laws have been effective, a similar accident occurred on June 4, 2013. In this particular accident, occurring at the same location, a truck loaded with methanol crashed into the barrier but was directed back away from the barrier. While it took many hours for the Hazmat teams to clean the mess up, there were no significant injuries.

Laws now exist designed to allow victims to seek recovery of damages in the event they are involved in an accident in which the truck driver is found to have acted in a negligent manner resulting in physical harm.

If you would like help with a Texas 18-wheeler accident that has resulted in physical harm, contact the law offices of Texas 18-wheeler accident Lawyers of Eberstein Whitherite LLP by calling 1-800 Truck Wreck (1-800-878-2597) any time of day or night.

source: http://www.1800truckwreck.com/1800-truck-wreck-reviews-1976-houston-ammonia-truck-disaster-listed-worst-houstons-history.html

Like Us on Facebook

Read the full story at http://newsreleases.submitpressrelease123.com/2016/06/23/the-1976-houston-ammonia-truck-disaster-listed-as-the-worst-in-houstons-history/

ReleaseID: 19911

Rand Spear a Philadelphia Car Accident Lawyer Obtains $2.7 Million in Accident Case for his client

Philadelphia, 06/23/2016 /SubmitPressRelease123/

Rand Spear a Philadelphia Car Accident Lawyer Obtains $2.7 Million in Accident Case for his client.

Philadelphia car accident lawyer Rand Spear, helped a 35-year old accident victim obtain a $2.7 million verdict. The defendant’s insurance company refused to take responsibility for the injuries so the jury imposed that liability on it. Spear discusses the case on a podcast available on YouTube.

The client was involved in an car accident that occurred at an intersection. Defendant offer a small amount to the plaintiff claiming it was the plaintiff who caused the accident. “With any case there’s two parts to the case. There’s the liability part where who caused the accident and who is responsible is decided. In some instances both people can be responsible for causing an accident,” Spear says.

Once a jury decides which party is liable for what share of the damages the amount of those damages needs to be determined. “It was an accident at an intersection and the defendant took the position that they were not responsible, that our client ran the red light and caused the accident,” Spear says, “I really thought that was a foolish position for them to take but insurance companies fight vigorously these claims and that’s really why you need to prepare, prepare and prepare.”

Spear says after explaining his client’s situation the insurance company only offered $5,000 to settle the case. “That was just such an insulting offer we made a decision that we were not going to let the insurance company push us around. We prepared our case, we prepared our client and we got ready to go to trial.”

Rand says his client suffered serious injuries including herniated discs in his spine, which has caused him severe pain and affected his nerves. “That’s a pretty significant finding for someone as young as 35 years old because you know when you’re 35 years old you have your whole life ahead of you.” The client had difficulty after the accident performing a lot of things the average person would take for granted.

Spear says at the trial he took the “high road” to tell his client’s story. “I believe that you put out the facts, you make your arguments and you know the truth will come out. We really believed in our client, he was very credible and I thought he made an excellent witness, gave an excellent presentation and we really did a good job cross-examining the defendant,” Spear says.

He says that thanks to the cross-examination of the defendant his explanation of the accident wasn’t believed by the jury. “It really wasn’t accurate, he really wasn’t being truthful.”

The jury looked at the life-long limitations and impact on the victim with the help of expert medical testimony. “We really want to explain to the jury what happened because you could look at someone and they look perfectly fine but a good physician is able to testify about injuries and limitations, we used models to show the injury to our client’s spine so the jury really understands exactly what happened.”

Another expert used in the case was a vocational expert. That person takes a detailed work and education history from the client, looks at government records and statistics and forms opinions as to what impact this type of injury is going to have on the victim’s future ability to make a living.

“Because our client was only 35 years old we were able to put up some significant numbers to show that as a result of this accident and his injuries the client was really going to have a significantly diminished earning capacity. The jury understood exactly what we were explaining and through detailed analysis we were able to establish how much money our client was going to lose,” Spear says.

Given the client’s injuries, resulting lifelong disabilities and expected financial losses due to limitations on his ability to make a living the jury decided the claim was worth $2.7 million. “That’s tremendous and that money will help him for the rest of his life in dealing with his injuries and his inability to earn money like he could have if he wasn’t injured.”

“That’s what we’ve been doing for more than 30 years. Our reputation is that we take cases to court if we can’t get a reasonable settlement from the insurance company. But if the insurance company is just not being reasonable and recognizing the extent of our client’s injuries and the life impact of those injuries we really go to bat for the client and do everything we can to get them the money they deserve.”
If you or a family member suffered a personal injury due to a vehicle accident Philadelphia car accident lawyer Rand Spear is available to help those living in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. His website is www.randspear.com and his phone number is 888-373-4LAW.

source: http://randspear.com/2016/06/06/philadelphia-car-accident-lawyer-client-obtains-2-7-million-accident-case/

Like Us on Facebook

Read the full story at http://newsreleases.submitpressrelease123.com/2016/06/23/rand-spear-blog-client-obtains-27-million/

ReleaseID: 19913

Xarelto Lawsuit Plaintiffs Note Lack Of Antidote At Time Of Drug’s Release To Market

June 23, 2016 – – TheProductLawyers.com announces that case selection in the mass litigation against Xarelto began earlier this year. The bellwether action brings the more than 2,200 suits represented by multidistrict litigation (MDL) 2952 before Judge Eldon Fallon, presiding in the Eastern District of Louisiana, who will determine the nature of the allegations against the new-generation anticoagulant.

Initially hailed as a breakthrough in the treatment of blood clots and attendant complications, critics now call Xarelto the most dangerous blood thinner on the market today. In many ways, the anticoagulant stood above the more established treatment options because it offered patients more freedoms than the previous blood thinners before it. Unfortunately, when Xarelto was released to the market it did not have an accompanying antidote as other anticoagulants had.

If a bleeding event occurs, the physician administering a traditional blood thinner can treat their patient with vitamin K. This reverses the drug’s impact and permits the body to clot blood. While blood clots in the circulatory system can be fatal, inability to clot a wound or internal rupture can also be deadly.

Physicians treating patients on Xarelto had to consider surgery or other drastic, life-saving measures in the event of bleeding because the impact of the drug could not be counteracted. This meant that clotting could not occur and a catastrophic bleeding episode could result in death. Xarelto was on the market for several years without a corresponding antidote, a point that many plaintiffs involved in the MDL note. Plaintiffs involved in Xarelto multidistrict litigation also allege that the drug put them at an increased risk for dangerous, uncontrollable bleeding.

While selection for the bellwether case began earlier in 2016, information about the potential issues involved with Xarelto use is becoming more widespread. This may result in additional cases being brought against the manufacturers of the anticoagulant in the coming year, as those who claim to have suffered harm while on Xarelto seek damages.

The attorneys of Banville Law, the firm behind TheProductLawyers.com, are offering complimentary consultations to anyone who suffered injury or hospitalization after a bleed while on Xarelto. For more information about this release or the Xarelto litigation call 888-997-3792.

###

Contact TheProductLawyers.com:

Banville Law
888-997-3792
info@banvillelaw.com
165 West End Ave #1h,
New York, NY 10023

ReleaseID: 60010979

Don’t Get Complacent With North Texas Heat

extreme_heat_photo.jpg

Dallas, 06/22/2016 /SubmitPressRelease123/

Legacy ER & Urgent Care Explains The Three Stages Of Heat-Related Illness

According to Legacy ER & Urgent Care, we’ve become far too accustomed to hearing about the heat each day on our morning newscasts: ozone action day, heat advisory, temperature alerts, record highs…but are we even listening?

“Living in a climate such as North Texas often leads to complacency when considering the high temperatures we experience in the summer months. But it’s very important to be aware of the cumulative and damaging effects of heat on our bodies. Everyone needs to plan ahead and take the right measure of precaution when spending an extended time outdoors in the heat,” said Dr. Jay Woody, founder and chief medical officer of Legacy ER & Urgent Care.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there are approximately 618 heat-related deaths per year in the U.S. Local statistics are every bit as alarming as well. According to the Dallas County Health and Human Services (DCHHS), Dallas County recorded two deaths in 2015, but almost 300 cases of heat-related illnesses.

Legacy ER & Urgent Care, a North Texas-based facility offering both ER and urgent care services, shares what you need to know about how to keep you and your family safe this summer:

There are three levels of heat-related illness which include heat cramps, heat exhaustion and heat stroke, each stage increasing in severity. All are compounded by one simple factor – the body’s inability to cool itself. The body must maintain a core temperature of approximately 98.6 F at all times to function properly. When the body is overexposed to extreme weather-related heat, it becomes more of a challenge to cool off. As a result, the body experiences the following stages of heat-related illness:

1.    Heat cramps – This is the first sign that the body is not cooling itself properly. It’s a mild reaction to overheating and includes muscle ache, thirst, and fatigue.

2.    Heat exhaustion – This is the next stage of overheating and is caused by a continued lack of treatment for the body’s reaction to extreme heat. Symptoms include nausea, dizziness, headache, and thirst.

3.    Heat stroke – This is the most severe stage of heat-related illness. It’s caused when the body becomes completely unable to cool itself. If not treated properly and immediately, heat stroke can be fatal.

There are other symptoms to look for which often serve as the body’s early warning sign of a reaction to extreme heat:

  • ·         Headache
  • ·         Fatigue
  • ·         Dizziness
  • ·         Fainting
  • ·         Profuse sweating
  • ·         Nausea
  • ·         Thirst
  • ·         Clammy skin
  • ·         Muscle cramps

According to the medical staff at Legacy, the best way to treat any of these early warning signs is to immediately:

  • ·         Remove any articles of clothing that may be causing the body to retain heat
  • ·         Drink water and/or liquids with electrolytes
  • ·         Immediately seek a shaded or cool area
  • ·         Use ice packs or fanning to cool down your body

Should heat-related symptoms persist or worsen, it’s important to seek medical help immediately, as these conditions can be progressive, leading to a life-threatening situation.

###

About Legacy ER & Urgent Care

Founded in 2008, Legacy ER & Urgent Care is one of the nation’s first healthcare models to offer both urgent care and emergency room billing options under one roof. It has built an exceptional customer service program and rating by providing transparent billing, soothing environments and one-on-one service with board-certified, emergency-trained physicians. Patients have access to immediate, on-site emergency room equipment and only pay emergency care prices when it is truly an emergency.

Media Contacts:

Jeff Cheatham

TrizCom PR

O: 972-247-1369

JeffC@TrizCom.com

Nikki Darling

TrizCom PR

O: 972-247-1369

Nikki@trizcom.com

Legacy ER & Urgent Care Locations:

1310 W. Exchange Parkway, Allen, Texas 75013: 972-678-4545

330 S. Denton Tap Road, Coppell, Texas 75019 469-312-7777

9205 Legacy Drive, Frisco, Texas 75033: 972-668-6020

16151 Eldorado Parkway, Frisco, Texas 75035: 972-731-5151

2810 Hardin Blvd. #100, McKinney, Texas 75070: 972-548-7277

8950 N. Tarrant Parkway, North Richland Hills, Texas 76182: 817-281-7277

Like Us on Facebook

Read the full story at http://newsreleases.submitpressrelease123.com/2016/06/22/dont-get-complacent-with-north-texas-heat/

ReleaseID: 19896

The Brickyard: A New York State Of Mind

Billingsley_Logo.png

Dallas, 06/23/2016 /SubmitPressRelease123/

Billingsley Company Brings NYC-Inspired Living To Dallas

New York City, known for its romantic industrial architecture, brick detail, metal-framed windows and walk-up style housing, is one of kind. Billingsley Company is bringing that same architectural charm to DFW in Farmer’s Branch, Texas, with The Brickyard – their new multifamily apartment community.

The Brickyard encompasses the best parts of New York architecture with all-brick buildings, metal awnings and natural lighting pouring in through the large arched windows, but at a fraction of the cost of living in New York City.

In Manhattan, the cost of living is more than double the national average: The average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in the Lower East Side is $3,558, according to the First quarter 2016 Citi Habitats market report, roughly equal to the entire monthly income of the typical U.S. worker.

Additionally, car owners pay an average parking rate of $533 per month in downtown Manhattan (Colliers International), and groceries cost between 28 and 39 percent more than the national average, depending on where residents live, according to the Council for Community and Economic Research.

Being in the Dallas-Ft. Worth Metroplex, the lower cost of living is one of the benefits of relocating to the area. However, locals don’t have to give up style for affordability. The Brickyard brings the Brooklyn charm and New York design to the Dallas area without the heavy price tag. Current pricing for The Brickyard ranges from $995 to $1910 per month (as of June 15, 2016).

Sumner Billingsley, a managing partner on The Brickyard project, took her experience living in the West Village in New York and translated it to fill a void in the Dallas market. “As a former resident of New York, I wanted to bring the rich neighborhood feel of the West Village and the Bowery to Dallas but at a price that was right for us. I have been told that ‘quality is remembered long after the price is forgotten.’ So our sole focus is to deliver a fantastic product, and I’m damned if I am not going to deliver it at a great price.”

Among the amenities featured in The Brickyard:

·      The Firehouse Clubroom

·      The Grind Fitness Center

·      The Ozone-filtered Pool, coming in August

·       Two parks named after New York City parks: Gramercy Garden and Mulberry Park

·      The Brickyard Leasing Center

For more information please visit www.Billingsleyco.com or http://www.thebrickyardapts.com/.
About Billingsley Company

Founded in 1978 by Lucy and Henry Billingsley, Billingsley Company expertly builds, owns and manages its properties, ensuring long-term client, resident, and partner return. Specializing in master-planned developments and principles of new urbanism, Billingsley Company’s developments are life-enhancing communities in which to work, live, play, shop and dine. Combining its relationships in the local market with its expertise in development, Billingsley Company provides expanded opportunities for its business partners. From raw land to fully developed communities, Billingsley Company is engaged in each step of the process. The company’s decisions in design, finance and construction are grounded in doing what is right for the long term.

About The Brickyard

The Brickyard is the first phase of apartments and townhomes in Mercer Crossing, the newest multi-use Billingsley development, located at the crossroads of Interstate 35E, Interstate 635 and President George Bush Turnpike. The Brickyard is a blend of one- and two-bedroom apartments and townhomes that embody romantic industrial architecture with the abundant use of brick, metal-framed windows and old-style painted signs on building walls. Residents have been moving into the community since May of 2016.

###

Media Contact:

Dana Cobb

TrizCom PR

Dana@TrizCom.com

O: 972-247-1369

C: 972- 955-9747

Like Us on Facebook

Read the full story at http://newsreleases.submitpressrelease123.com/2016/06/23/the-brickyard-a-new-york-state-of-mind/

ReleaseID: 19899

Local Click Advanced Development Solutions Offers Free Reputation Report

June 23, 2016 – – Local Click Advanced Development Solutions, based in Cambridge, NY, has launched a new Local Business Analyzer, which helps businesses identify what their current reputation is. The company has decided to offer this reputation report for free because having an excellent online reputation is one of the most important things for the online success of a business. Achieving, and then maintaining, this positive reputation, however, requires a significant investment of time and effort. The report, which is valued at $197, is currently available through http://famousreputation.com, with no credit information required.

James W. Sweeney, CEO of Local Click Advanced Development Solutions says: “87% of consumers referred to a business or practice, go online to find more information. So, your business or practice must be listed properly online.”

Building an excellent online reputation is hard work and it is also hard to find out whether such efforts are having an effect. This is why Local Click is now offering the reputation report to all interested parties. This report will show them the latest trends on what customers are saying about them, any negative reviews that have been posted, and business strategies that they can implement in order to get more customers.

Once businesses have entered their company information, the proprietary software will get to work on creating a comprehensive report. This report will show the business what their current issues are, as well as how they can fix and correct them. Local Click Advanced Development Solutions also includes a self guided tour to the report, which explains exactly what business needed to do in order to correct any problems that they come across.

It should be noted that the report does more than just show businesses what consumers are saying about them online. It also enables them to search all the top business directories, so that they can check whether the information listed about them is correct or not. Lastly, it enables them to see just how visible their business is to potential customers.

James Sweeney has also asked people to connect with him on Twitter through https://twitter.com/sweeneyjames. Here, he regularly shares information on reputation management strategies that businesses can implement.

###

Contact Local Click Advanced Development Solutions:

James W Sweeney
518-595-3098
james@locallytargetedmarketing.com
6 Myrtle Ave
Cambridge, NY 12816

ReleaseID: 60010931

Medical Device Company: Cook Medical, The Focus of IVC Filter Lawsuit Cases Filed By 2 Canadian Plaintiffs

June 23, 2016 – – TheProductLawyers.com reports on Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) filters and the mounting controversy over their use in those patients who cannot take traditional blood-thinning medications. The IVC filters are placed in the inferior vena cava vein that transports blood to major body parts such as the lungs and heart. The purpose of the implantation in this major vein is to prevent the occurrence of a pulmonary embolism, which is when a pulmonary artery is blocked by a blood clot. Such blockages can be very dangerous and fatal in some instances. The implantation of these devices is intended as a temporary measure and as per the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the IVC filters should be removed within 29-54 days to prevent the onset of medical problems.

Two class action suits have been filed by Canadian plaintiffs against Cook Medical who have had IVC filters implanted in their bodies. These plaintiffs claim that the filters were defectively manufactured and can break apart while inside the body and be transported to other areas of the body. This could potentially cause veins to be punctured or the pieces to become embedded in the intestines.

The first plaintiff is a woman who had to have an IVC filter placed in her since she could not be given a traditional blood thinner. The IVC filter was used as a precautionary measure to prevent blood clots from moving from her lower body to her heart and lungs. When the removal surgery was completed, doctors discovered the device had moved to another location and decided its removal was too risky. The second plaintiff endured two removal surgeries that were not successful, with a third scheduled that was ultimately canceled due to the risk involved. He now says he suffers from dizzy spells since the device is clogging blood flow in his body.

For more information on IVC filters, to ask questions or to schedule a consultation, contact an attorney at Banville Law by calling (888) 997-3792.

###

Contact TheProductLawyers.com:

Banville Law
888-997-3792
info@banvillelaw.com
165 West End Ave #1h,
New York, NY 10023

ReleaseID: 60010961