Monthly Archives: March 2017

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Psychemedics Corporation (PMD) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline: April 3, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Psychemedics Corporation (“Psychemedics” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: PMD) and certain of its officers, on behalf of a class who purchased Psychemedics securities between February 28, 2014 and January 30, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: www.bgandg.com/pmd.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) through its affiliate, Psychemedics Brasil Exames Toxicologicos Ltda., Psychemedics engaged in anticompetitive conduct to maintain a monopoly over the Brazilian market in violation of the law; (2) effectively, Psychemedics lacked effective internal controls over financial reporting; and (3) consequently, Psychemedics’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On January 31, 2017, it was revealed that Psychemedics Brasil Exames Toxicologicos Ltda., Psychemedics’ local representative in Brazil, was ordered to compensate Omega Laboratories, Inc. USA for losses caused by anticompetitive practices used for “preventing other companies from accessing (the) market.” Following this news, Psychemedics stock dropped during intra-trading on January 31, 2017.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: www.bgandg.com/pmd, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Psychemedics, you have until April 3, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 454540

SHAREHOLDER ALERT – Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Notifies Investors of Class Action Against Graña y Montero S.A.A. (GRAM) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline – April 28, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Graña y Montero S.A.A. (“Graña” or the “Company”) (NYSE: GRAM) and certain of its officers, and is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased Graña securities between April 30, 2014 through February 24, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are advised to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/gram.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, and failed that: (1) Graña was aware that its Brazilian partner, Odebrecht S.A., paid bribes to former Peruvian President Alejandro Toledo to win construction work on a road traveling from Peru to Brazil; and (2) consequently, defendants’ statements about Graña’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

On February 24, 2017, local news magazine Hildebrandt en sus trece revealed that Graña y Montero was aware of $20 million in bribes conferred to former President Alejandro Toledo by Brazilian firm Odebrecht SA. Graña was one of Odebrecht’s local partners on two sections of a project to pave a road from the Peruvian Amazon to Brazil. Following this news, Graña shares dropped $1.77 per share, or over 34%, to close $3.32 on February 24, 2017.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/gram, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Graña y Montero S.A.A., you have until April 28, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 456145

Interventional Radiology Imaging Market by Product, Procedures & Application – Global Forecast to 2021

The global interventional radiology imaging market is expected to reach USD 23.50 billion by 2021 from USD 16.99 billion in 2016, at a CAGR of 6.7%. The market is broadly classified into product, procedures, and application. The market is dominated by North America.

Pune, India – March 15, 2017 /MarketersMedia/

Interventional Radiology Imaging Market is expected to reach $23.50 billion by 2021 Led by North America

The key players in the market include GE Healthcare (General Electric Company) (U.K.), Siemens Healthcare GmBH (Siemens AG) (Germany), Koninklijke Philips N.V. (The Netherlands), Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation (Toshiba Corporation) (Japan), Hitachi Medical Corporation (Hitachi Ltd.) (Japan), Carestream Health, Inc. (U.S.), Esaote S.p.A (Italy), Hologic, Inc. (U.S.), Fujifilm Corporation (Japan), Samsung Medison (South Korea), and Shimadzu Corporation (Japan).

Download Sample Copy of Report: http://www.rnrmarketresearch.com/contacts/request-sample?rname=913153

On the basis of product, the market is segmented intoangiography systems, fluoroscopy systems, CT scanners, ultrasound-imaging systems, MRI system, and other devices (C-arm, contrast media injectors,& imaging catheter guidewires). The MRI system segment is estimated to account for the largest share of the market in 2016.Factors such as technological advancements and product launches are driving the growth of this segment.

Based on procedure, the market is segmented into angiography, angioplasty, embolization, thrombolysis, vertebroplasty, nephrostomy, and other procedures (biliary drainage, fallopian tube recanalization, cholecystectomy, and carotid-cavernous fistula). The angiography segment is projected to witness the highest growth in this market due to increasing prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and the growing demand for minimally invasive procedures.

By applications, the market is segmented into cardiology, oncology, urology & nephrology, gastroenterology, and other applications (orthopedics, neurology, and gynecology). The oncology segment is projected to witness the highest growth in this market due to increase in the incidence of cancer and rising demand for minimally invasive procedures.

Geographically, the market is dominated by North America, followed by Europe, Asia, and the Rest of the World (RoW). Growth in the North American regionis primarily driven by the increase in the prevalence and incidence of chronic diseases and the aging population.

Ask For Discount: http://www.rnrmarketresearch.com/contacts/discount?rname=913153

Research Coverage:

Apart from comprehensive geographic and product analysis and market sizing, the report also provides a competitive landscape that covers the growth strategies adopted by industry players over the last three years. In addition, the company profiles comprise the product portfolios, developments, and strategies adopted by the market players to maintain and increase their shares in the market. The abovementioned market research data, current market size, and forecast of the future trends will help market players and new entrants to make the necessary decisions regarding product offerings, geographic focus, change in strategic approach, and levels of output to remain successful in the market.

Scope of the Report:

This report categorizes the interventional radiology imaging market into the following segments:

Interventional Radiology Market, by Product
• MRI System
• Ultrasound Imaging System
• CT Scanner
• Angiography System
• Fluoroscopy System
• Biopsy System
• Other Products

Interventional Radiology Market, by Procedures
• Angiography
• Angioplasty
• Embolization
• Biopsy
• Vertebroplasty
• Thrombolysis
• Nephrostomy Placement
• Other Procedures

Interventional Radiology Market, by Application
• Oncology
• Cardiology
• Urology & Nephrology
• Gastroenterology
• Other Applications

Interventional Radiology Market, by Region
• North America
• Europe
• Asia
• Rest of the World (Australia, New Zealand, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa)

Customization Options:
• Company Information: Detailed company profiles of five or more market players
• Opportunities Assessment: A detailed report underlining the various growth opportunities presented in the market

Reasons to Buy the Report:

This report will enable both established firms as well as new entrants/smaller firms to gauge the pulse of the market, which in turn will help these firms garner greater market shares. Firms purchasing the report can use any one or a combination of the below-mentioned five strategies to strengthen their market shares.

The report provides insights on the following pointers:

• Market Penetration: Comprehensive information on the product portfolios of the top players in the interventional radiology imaging market. The report analyses the interventional radiology imaging market: byproduct, by procedure, and by application.
• Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on the upcoming technologies, R&D activities, and product launches in the interventional radiology imaging market
• Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of the market strategies, geographic and business segments, and product portfolios of the leading players in the interventional radiology imaging market
• Market Development: Comprehensive information about emerging markets. This report analyzes the market for various interventional radiology imaging products across geographies
• Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the interventional radiology imaging market

Buy Interventional Radiology Imaging Market Report Here :http://www.rnrmarketresearch.com/contacts/purchase?rname=913153

About Us:

ReportsnReports.com is your single source for all market research needs. Our database includes 500,000+ market research reports from over 95 leading global publishers & in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets. With comprehensive information about the publishers and the industries for which they publish market research reports, we help you in your purchase decision by mapping your information needs with our huge collection of reports.

Contact Info:
Name: Ritesh Tiwari
Email: sales@reportsandreports.com
Organization: ReportsnReports
Address: 2nd floor, metropole, Next to inox theatre, Bund garden road, Pune-411001
Phone: + 1 888 391 5441

Source URL: http://marketersmedia.com/interventional-radiology-imaging-market-by-product-procedures-application-global-forecast-to-2021/178035

For more information, please visit http://www.rnrmarketresearch.com/interventional-radiology-market-by-product-mri-system-ultrasound-imaging-system-ct-scanner-angiography-system-procedures-angiography-angioplasty-biopsy-application-cardiology-oncology-urology-nephro-st-to-2021-market-report.html

Source: MarketersMedia

Release ID: 178035

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Notifies Investors of Class Action Against Cemtrex, Inc. (CETX) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline: April 25, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Cemtrex, Inc. (“Cemtrex” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: CETX) and certain of its officers, and is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased Cemtrex securities between February 11, 2016 and February 22, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are advised to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/cetx.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) over $1 million has been paid to notorious stock promoters since late 2015; (2) the entity paying for the stock promotion was owned by Cemtrex’s founder, Aron Govil, and based out of Cemtrex’s corporate headquarters; (3) senior executives engaged in undisclosed insider selling; and (4) Cemtrex retained a foreign accounting firm with a history of fraudulent endeavors to conduct its financial audits. Consequently, Defendants’ statements about Cemtrex’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis throughout the Class Period.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/cetx, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Cemtrex, you have until April 25, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 456344

SHAREHOLDER ALERT – Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline – March 24, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Banc of California, Inc. (“Banc of California” or the “Company”) (NYSE: BANC) and certain of its officers, on behalf of a class who purchased Banc securities between August 7, 2015 and January 20, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/banc.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Banc is a financial holding company with operations in commercial, mortgage and corporate banking and financial advisory.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse facts about its business, operations, and prospects, including that Banc had large ties to an alleged “fraudster” named Jason Galanis (“Galanis”) and that these connections could create substantial regulatory risk and jeopardize the market price of the Company’s stock. Consequently, Defendants’ positive statements about Banc’s business, operations, and prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis throughout the Class Period.

On September 7, 2016, Bloomberg News published a report on Banc highlighting several related-party transactions, including Banc paying $100 million for the naming rights on Los Angeles’s new soccer stadium for a soccer team whose investors included the brother of Banc’s CEO, “marking the latest in a series of deals involving the CEO’s family and associates,” and stated that such “transactions, even when disclosed, should serve as warning signs for investors when deciding whether to buy stock.” In less than a week of the article being published, Banc’s stock dropped under $21 per share. On September 20, 2016, Banc revealed that its CFO had resigned after only a year on the job. Following this news, Banc’s stock dropped again, and went from $20.51 per share to just $17.61 per share within a week.

On October 18, 2016, Seeking Alpha published a report alleging that Banc of California had been concealing its numerous connections with Jason Galanis, who had been convicted of criminal securities fraud, including that: (1) Banc of California CEO, Jason Sugarman, was the founder, CEO, and indirect owner of a company controlled by Galanis; and (2) Galanis controlled Banc of California’s founding shareholder. The article also wrote that Banc of California had used an off-balance sheet entity to make loans to insiders. Following this news, Banc of California stock dropped over 29% per share to close at $11.26 per share on October 18, 2016.

On November 10, 2016, Banc of California revealed that it was postponing the filing of its Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2016 in order for its Special Committee to finish its review of certain purported improper relationships and related party transactions.

Then, on January 23, 2017, Banc issued a press release divulging the resignation of its CEO and Chairman of the Board, Steven A. Sugarman, and said that the SEC had initiated a formal order of investigation directed at certain of the issues that Banc’s Special Committee was reviewing concerning the Company’s response to the October 18, 2016 Seeking Alpha article where Banc had mischaracterized the investigation into Seeking Alpha’s allegations. Following this news, Banc stock dropped $1.50 per share, or 9%, to close at $14.65 per share on January 23, 2017.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/banc, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Banc, you have until March 24, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 454006

SHAREHOLDER ALERT – Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Notifies Investors of Class Action Against AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. (AFSI) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline: May 1, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. (“AmTrust” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: AFSI) and certain of its officers, and is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased AmTrust securities between May 10, 2016 and February 24, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are advised to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/afsi.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) AmTrust had ineffective assessment of the risks associated with the financial reporting; (2) AmTrust had an insufficient complement of corporate accounting and corporate financial reporting resources within the organization; (3) as a result, AmTrust lacked effective controls over financial reporting; and (4) consequently, defendants’ statements about AmTrust’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

On February 27, 2017, AmTrust revealed that it “identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting that existed as of December 31, 2016, specifically related to ineffective assessment of the risks associated with the financial reporting, and an insufficient complement of corporate accounting and corporate financial reporting resources within the organization.” AmTrust also said that it would delay filing its 2016 annual financial statements and that it “identified and corrected errors during the three months ended December 31, 2016 related to prior periods in 2016 and 2015.” Following this news, AmTrust stock dropped $5.32 per share, or over 19.23%, to close at $22.34 on February 27, 2017.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/afsi, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in AmTrust, you have until May 1, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 456269

SHAREHOLDER ALERT – Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Regulus Therapeutics Inc. (RGLS) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline: April 3, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Regulus Therapeutics Inc. (“Regulus” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: RGLS) and certain of its officers, on behalf of a class who purchased Regulus securities between January 21, 2016 and June 27, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/rgls.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about Regulus’ business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) patients treated with RG-101 were at higher risk of contracting jaundice; (2) as a result, Regulus had exaggerated RG-101’s approval prospects and/or commercial sustainability; and (3) consequently, Regulus’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On June 27, 2016, Regulus released that it had received notice from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) that its new drug for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection which was under FDA review, is now being put on clinical hold after a second serious case of jaundice was reported. Following this news, Regulus dropped $2.47 per share, or over 49%, to close at $2.54 on June 28, 2016.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/rgls, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Regulus, you have until April 3, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 454092

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against The Western Union Company (WU) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline – March 27, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against The Western Union Company (“Western Union” or the “Company”) (NYSE: WU) and certain of its officers, on behalf of a class who purchased Western Union securities between February 24, 2012 and January 19, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/wu.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Western Union’s fraud prevention efforts did not comply with applicable laws; (2) Western Union knowingly failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program; (3) Western Union aided and abetted wire fraud; (4) for at least five years, Western Union knew of agents structuring transactions designed to avoid the reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act; (5) Western Union was not compliant with its regulatory responsibilities; (6) between 2004 and 2012, Western Union violated U.S. laws – the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-fraud statutes – by processing hundreds of thousands of transactions for Western Union agents and others involved in an international consumer fraud scheme; (7) Western Union knew of but failed to take corrective action against Western Union agents involved in or facilitating fraud-related transactions; (8) from January 1, 2004 and August 29, 2015, Western Union received at least 550,928 complaints about fraud-induced money transfers, totaling at least $632,721,044; and (9) consequently, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On January 19, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission publicized that Western Union admitted to “aiding and abetting wire fraud” by allowing scammers to process transactions even when Western Union realized its agents were disguising transactions to avoid detection and, therefore, settled to pay $586 million. Following this news, Western Union stock dropped 3.30% to close at $21.13 per share on January 19, 2017.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/wu, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Western Union, you have until March 27, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 453702

SHAREHOLDER ALERT – Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Notifies Investors of Class Action Against Rentech, Inc. (RTK) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline – April 24, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Rentech, Inc. (“Rentech” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: RTK) and certain of its officers, and is on behalf of purchasers of Rentech securities between November 9, 2016 and February 20, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/rtk.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

The Complaint alleges that Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Rentech’s resources were not sufficient to overcome any operating challenges and remaining bottleneck at its Wawa facility; (2) as result, the Wawa facility would not reach approximately 60% of production capacity within the next couple quarters and achieve full capacity in the range of 400,000 to 450,000 metric tons late in the year; (3) consequently, Defendants’ statements about Rentech’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

On February 21, 2017, Rentech revealed that due to equipment and operational issues that require additional unbudgeted capital investments, it would idle its Wawa facility. Rentech also mentioned “continued uncertainty” about the profitability of pellets produced at the facility and advised shareholders that it was exploring strategic alternatives for both the Wawa facility and the Company. Following this news, Rentech stock dropped over 47% from its previous closing price to close at $1.44 per share on February 21, 2017.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/rtk, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Rentech, you have until April 24, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 455885

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Announces an Investigation into Whether the Sale of Air Methods Corp. to American Securities LLC for $43 Per Share is Fair to Shareholders – AIRM

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / The following statement is being issued by Levi & Korsinsky, LLP:

To: All Persons or Entities who purchased Air Methods Corp. (NYSE: AIRM) stock prior to March 14, 2017.

You are hereby notified that Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has commenced an investigation into the fairness of the sale of Air
Methods Corp. to American Securities LLC for $43 per share. To learn more about the action and your rights, go to: http://zlk.9nl.com/air-methods-airm, or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at jlevi@levikorsinsky.com or by telephone at (212) 363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972. There is no cost or obligation to you.

Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, Connecticut, California, and Washington D.C. The firm’s attorneys have extensive expertise in prosecuting securities litigation involving financial fraud, representing investors throughout the nation in securities lawsuits and have recovered
hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. For more information, please feel free to contact any of the attorneys listed below. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Eduard Korsinsky, Esq.
30 Broad Street – 24th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Toll Free: (877) 363-5972
Fax: (212) 363-7171
www.zlk.com

SOURCE: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP

ReleaseID: 457351