Monthly Archives: March 2017

SHAREHOLDER ALERT – Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Gigamon, Inc. (GIMO) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline – March 28, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Gigamon, Inc. (“Gigamon” or the “Company”) (NYSE: GIMO) and certain of its officers, on behalf of a class who purchased Gigamon securities between October 27, 2016 and January 17, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/gimo.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the its business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose that: (1) Gigamon was suffering reduced product bookings in its North America West region; (2) several of Gigamon’s significant customers were deferring purchasing decisions into 2017; (3) Gigamon failed to properly include these trends in its financial guidance; and (4) consequently, Defendants’ statements about Gigamon’s business, operations, and prospects, including statements about its revenue guidance, were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

On January 17, 2017, Gigamon revealed its preliminary fourth quarter and 2016 fiscal year results. Gigamon also stated that fourth quarter revenue for the period ending December 31, 2016 would be “$84.5 million to $85 million compared to the company’s prior guidance of $91 million to $93 million [announced on October 27, 2016].” Moreover, Gigamon said that “[f]ourth quarter revenue fell short primarily due to lower than expected product bookings in our North America West region, as several significant existing customer accounts deferred purchasing decisions into 2017.” Following this news, Gigamon stock fell dropped $12.65 per share, or 28.7%, to close at $31.40 per share on January 18, 2017.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/gimo, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Gigamon, you have until March 28, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 453739

SHAREHOLDER ALERT – Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against State Street Corporation (STT) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline – March 28, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed State Street Corporation (“State Street” or the “Company”) (NYSE: STT) and certain of its officers, on behalf of a class who purchased State Street securities between February 27, 2012 and January 18, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/stt.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) State Street engaged in a scheme to defraud a number of its clients by secretly applying commissions to billions of dollars of securities trades; (2) State Street’s billing practices relied on unsustainable methodologies; (3) over 18-years, roughly $240 million or more of expenses may have been incorrectly invoiced to State Street’s asset servicing clients; (4) from June 2010 until September 2011, State Street charged clients “substantial” mark-ups without their consent; and (5) consequently, Defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

On January 18, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice publicized that State Street entered a deferred prosecution agreement and settled to pay a criminal penalty of $32.3 million to resolve charges that it was involved in a scheme to defraud several of the bank’s clients by secretly applying commissions to billions of dollars of securities trades. State Street also agreed to offer an equal amount as a civil penalty to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, equaling an aggregate settlement of more than $64 million. State Street admitted the allegations and agreed to a deferred prosecution agreement that requires it to employ an independent corporate compliance monitor for three years.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/stt, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in State Street, you have until March 28, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 453738

DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Natus Medical Incorporated (BABY) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline: March 31, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Natus Medical Incorporated (“Natus” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: BABY) and certain of its officers, and is on behalf of shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired Natus securities between October 16, 2015 and April 3, 2016, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are advised to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/baby.

The class action lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse facts about Natus’ business, operations, and prospects, including that: (1) the Venezuelan government failed to make tens of millions of dollars in prepayments to Natus, which were required to have been paid beginning in October 2015; (2) Natus had no means to effectively enforce its rights under its supply contract, as Venezuela was the exclusive forum for dispute resolution; (3) Natus’ receipt of revenues pursuant to the supply contract was contingent on the outcome of Venezuelan elections; and (4) consequently, Natus was not on track to achieve the increased guidance provided by Defendants, which lacked a reasonable basis. Once this information was made known to the investing public, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/baby, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Natus, you have until March
31, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 454436

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. (STML) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline: April 4, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. (“Stemline” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: STML) and certain of its officers, on behalf of a class who purchased Stemline securities between January 20, 2017 and February 1, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/stml.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose that: (1) a patient had died in the BPDCN Trial from capilliary leak syndrome immediately prior to Stemline’s stock offering despite constantly affirming that capillary leak syndrome was a potential side-effect of SL-401; and (2) SL-401’s safety profile was not predictable and manageable over increasing treatment duration, drug exposure, and patient experience as represented by the Defendants.

On January 19, 2017, Stemline announced its proposed public offering of common stock and on the next day, January 20, 2017, Stemline set the pricing of the public offering of 4.5 million shares at $10.00 per share, with projected gross proceeds of $45 million. On February 2, 2017, TheStreet narrated that on January 18, 2017, a cancer patient in a clinical trial died from a severe side effect tied to Stemline’s drug SL-401 and this information was not disclosed to investors who bought into Stemline’s public offering. Following this news, Stemline stock dropped during intraday trading on February 2, 2017.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/stml, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Stemline, you have until April 4, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 454385

Stinger Missiles Skyrocket Best DFW Limo Company Car Service Business for Dallas

Limousines of Las Colinas, a Dallas-Fort Worth limo ground transportation company, is scrambling to handle all the calls. This week’s news about Uber drivers has the frightened the public. One Uber driver sought out Stinger missiles, according to Dallas-Fort Worth WFAA news.

Stinger Missiles Skyrocket Best DFW Limo Company Car Service Business for Dallas

Irving, United States – March 15, 2017 /PressCable/

A well-established Dallas-Fort Worth limo and ground transportation company, Limousines of Las Colinas, says business is suddenly booming. Terrible news about Uber drivers has the public terrified. According to Dallas-Fort Worth WFAA news one Uber driver, charged with sexual assault of a passenger, attempted to buy AT-4 anti-tank rockets and Stinger missiles.

The Uber passenger rape charges are terrible and very sad, but even more troubling, as far as David DesJardins was concerned, was the fact that one Uber driver had attempted to buy AT-4 anti-tank rockets. David said that he has no idea why this driver was trying to buy AT-4 anti-tank rockers and Stinger missiles, but he’s not taking any chances.

“I am strongly considering approaching one of our defense contractor corporate clients about installing a rocket defense shield for our limos in light of this disturbing news”, says Mr. DesJardins.

Information about David’s Limousines of Las Colinas can be found on their website: http://www.limosdfw.com

Company Name: Limousines of Las Colinas Address: 2406 Muret Street, Irving, Texas 75062 Phone: 972-570-5808

More than 300 of the Uber-type drivers in Dallas have been convicted of serious crimes. Some of the crimes include robbery and sexual assault. One Uber passenger was left a quadriplegic after a wreck by one Uber driver who ran a red light, according to WFAA of Dallas-Fort Worth.

To review the news article on WFAA: http://www.wfaa.com/mb/news/no-rules-of-the-road/4…

For over 30 years, Limousines of Las Colinas has served Dallas – Fort Worth corporate clients and hundreds of Hollywood celebrities and has earned many five star reviews, according to Mr. DesJardins.

Providing full-service ground transportation with town cars, suburbans, sprinters, and even large buses, Limousines of Las Colinas has stood the test of time. Mr. DesJardins likes to clarify that his company handles any ground transportation needs from the simplest airport car rides to complex transportation needs. David says it is an urban legend that he has arranged rides on the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird.

For the premier of the movie, 13 hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi, which was held at AT&T Stadium, Limousines of Las Colinas, named for an area near Irving Texas, coordinated the transportation for thousands of people, David DesJardins mentioned.

With a million dollar smile, sparkling sense of humor, and a wholesome personality, David DesJardins has had a wonderful reception from both the celebrities and the huge corporation owners who seek his professional transportation services. David says the video on his website has caused many clients to fall down laughing, necessitating several 911 calls. He’s just kidding about the 911 calls.

The video may be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfVgnGnGcag

Contact Information: Contact: David DesJardins, CEO Company Name: Limousines of Las Colinas Address: 2406 Muret Street, Irving, Texas 75062 Phone: 972-570-5808 http://www.limosdfw.com

Contact Info:
Name: David DesJardins, CEO
Email: limos@verizon.net
Organization: Limousines of Las Colinas
Address: 2406 Muret Street, Irving, Texas 75062, United States
Phone: +1-972-570-5808

For more information, please visit http://www.limosdfw.com

Source: PressCable

Release ID: 178101

3D Bioprinting Market Research Analysis Covering Global Trends and Business Forecast Based on Product Type, Application and End-User

3D Bioprinting Market Information by Product Type (Photo Polymerization, Electro Beam melting, Laser Beam Melting, Droplet disposition), by Application (Tissue printing, Tissue Creation, Surgery), by End User (Hospital, Research Facilities) – Forecast to 2027

Pune, India – March 15, 2017 /MarketersMedia/

Synopsis of 3D Bioprinting Market:

Market Research Future published a Half-Cooked Research Report on 3D Bioprinting Market that contains information from 2014 to 2027.

Market Segmentation

Global 3D Bioprinting has been segmented as follows:

• On the basis of Product Types which include Electro Beam melting, Laser Beam Melting, Photo – Polymerization and Droplet disposition.
• On the basis of Application which consists of tissue printing, tissue creation and surgery.
• On the basis of End Users which includes Hospital and Research Facilities.

Key Players for 3D Bioprinting Market:

Some of the key players for this market are

• Organovo
• Cyfuse Biomedical
• BioBots, Aspect Biosystems
• 3D Bioprinting Solutions
• Rokit, TeVido Biodevices
• 3Dynamics System
• Cyfuse Biomedical K.K.
• Envision TEC
• Stratasys Ltd

Request a Sample Copy of Report @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/869

Market Overview:

3D bioprinting is the process of creating cell designs in a confined space 3D printing technologies where cell capacity and reasonability are preserved within the printed construct. 3D bio printing uses the layer-by-layer strategy to make tissue-like structures that are later utilized as a part of medicinal and tissue engineering fields. Bio printing covers a wide range of materials.

Regional Analysis:

The North American market for 3D Bioprinting is one of the emerging markets, in the North American countries, R&D investment and funding is prone to increase at a quicker rate, turning the tables from near to zero growth. Europe is the second-largest market for 3D Bio printing.

Access the market data and information presented through data tables and figures spread 115 pages of the project report “Global 3D Bioprinting Market

Browse Report Details @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/3d-bioprinting-market

The reports also covers brief analysis of Geographical Region includes:

Americas

North America

• US
• Canada

Latin America

Europe

Western Europe

• Germany
• France
• Italy
• Spain
• U.K
• Rest of Western Europe

Eastern Europe

Asia– Pacific

Asia

• China
• India
• Japan
• South Korea
• Rest of Asia

Pacific

The Middle East& Africa

Request Table of Contents and List of Figures @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/request-toc/869

Brief Table of Contents for 3D Bioprinting Market

1. Report Prologue

2. Introduction

2.1 Definition
2.2 Scope of the Study
2.3 Market Structure
2.4. Market Segmentation

3. Research Methodology

3.1 Research Process
3.2 Primary Research
3.3 Secondary Research

4. Market Dynamics

4.1 Drivers
4.2 Restraints
4.3 Opportunities

5. Market Factor Analysis

5.1 Value Chain Analysis
5.2 PORTERS Five Forces
5.3 Demand & Supply: Gap Analysis

6. Global 3D Bioprinting Market by Product Type

7. Global 3D Bioprinting Market by Application

8. Global 3D Bioprinting Market by End User

CONTINUED….

About Market Research Future:

At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research & Consulting Services.

MRFR team have supreme objective to provide the optimum quality market research and intelligence services to our clients. Our market research studies by products, services, technologies, applications, end users, and market players for global, regional, and country level market segments, enable our clients to see more, know more, and do more, which help to answer all their most important questions.

In order to stay updated with technology and work process of the industry, MRFR often plans & conducts meet with the industry experts and industrial visits for its research analyst members.

Contact Info:
Name: Akash Anand
Email: akash.anand@marketresearchfuture.com
Organization: Market Research Future (MRFR)
Address: Office No. 528, Amanora Chambers Magarpatta Road, Hadapsar, Pune – 411028 Maharashtra, India
Phone: +1 646 845 9312

Source URL: http://marketersmedia.com/3d-bioprinting-market-research-analysis-covering-global-trends-and-business-forecast-based-on-product-type-application-and-end-user/178076

For more information, please visit https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/3d-bioprinting-market

Source: MarketersMedia

Release ID: 178076

Global UAV Payload and Subsystems Market Players Analysis, Industry Technologies and Forecast to 2021

Global UAV Payload and Subsystems Market by payload (C4I, Radar, Electronic Warfare (EW), Electro-optic and Infrared Sensor (EO/IS), and Sonar), and by Geography- Forecast To 2021

Pune, India – March 15, 2017 /MarketersMedia/

Market Synopsis

Global UAV Payload and Subsystems Market are expected to grow at a CAGR of around 9% during 2016-2021. This growth is driven due to significant demand for UAVs and increasing demand for light weight thermal imager, intelligence, surveillance and communication at defense, commercial and homeland application.
As per the MRFR analysis, growing demand for UAVs is one of the major drivers for Global UAV Payload and Subsystems Market because of its extensive range of applications in the commercial, civil, as well as military market. The challenges associated with the market are the risk of collision with domestic flights and attacks using UAVs.

Americas is leading the Global UAV Payload and Subsystems Market; however the demand has increased from emerging nations such as EMEA and Asia Pacific in relation to increasing defense spending to counter national security threat.

Access Report Details @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/uav-payload-subsystems-market

Competitive Analysis-

Major Key Players in UAV Payload and Subsystems Market are

• Aero Vironment,
• BAE Systems
• Lockheed Martin,
• Northrop Grumman
• Boeing,
• Elbit Systems,
• Controp Precision Technologies Ltd,
• Alpha Unmanned Systems,
• Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd

Key Findings

• In 2015, Americas account the maximum market share of around 50%, followed by EMEA with 22%, and APAC with 28%.
• In 2015, C4I systems captured the market with a share of around 32% and also expect to lead the market in 2021
• In Americas, the number of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in 2012 were 6,316 and is likely to reach 8,300 by 2017

Request a Sample Copy of Report @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/1237

Study Objectives of UAV Payload and Subsystems Market

• To provide detailed analysis of the market structure along with forecast for the next 5 years of the various segments and sub-segments of the Global UAV Payload and Subsystems Market
• To provide insights about factors affecting the market growth
• To analyse the Global UAV Payload and Subsystems Market based on various factors- price analysis, supply chain analysis, porter’s five force analysis etc.
• To provide historical and forecast revenue of the market segments and sub-segments with respect to four main geographies and their countries- North America, Europe, Asia, and Rest of the World (ROW)
• To provide country-level analysis of the market with respect to the current market size and future prospective
• To provide country-level analysis of the market for segment by payload and regions

Access the market data and market information presented through more than 40 market data tables and 25 figures spread over 103 numbers of pages of the project report “UAV Payload and Subsystems Market – Forecast to 2021

Brief TOC of Global UAV Payload and Subsystems Market

1. Introduction
1.1 Report Description
1.2 Research Objective
2. Executive Summary
2.1 Key Findings / Highlights
2.1.1 Investment Opportunities
2.1.2 Market Startegies
2.1.3 Latest Developments

3. Scope of the Study
3.1 Markets Covered
3.2 Years Considered For the Study (2016-2021)
3.2 Geographic Scope
3.3 Key Stakeholders

4. Assumptions and Limitations

5. Research Methodology

Continued….

About Market Research Future:

At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research & Consulting Services.

MRFR team have supreme objective to provide the optimum quality market research and intelligence services to our clients. Our market research studies by products, services, technologies, applications, end users, and market players for global, regional, and country level market segments, enable our clients to see more, know more, and do more, which help to answer all their most important questions.

Contact Info:
Name: Akash Anand
Email: akash.anand@marketresearchfuture.com
Organization: Market Research Future
Address: Office No. 528, Amanora Chambers Magarpatta Road, Hadapsar, Pune – 411028 Maharashtra, India
Phone: +1 646 845 9312

Source URL: http://marketersmedia.com/global-uav-payload-and-subsystems-market-players-analysis-industry-technologies-and-forecast-to-2021/178088

For more information, please visit https://www.marketresearchfuture.com

Source: MarketersMedia

Release ID: 178088

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Egalet Corporation (EGLT) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline – March 28, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Egalet Corporation (“Egalet” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: EGLT) and certain of its officers, and is on behalf of shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired Egalet securities between December 15, 2015, and January 9, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are advised to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/eglt.

The class action lawsuit seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse information about its lead product, ARYMO ER, and the likelihood that it would receive oral abuse-deterrent labeling.

On January 9, 2017, Egalet released a statement announcing the approval of its product Arymo ER. Later that day, the U.S. Federal Drug Administration stated that a competitor product MorphaBond “has marketing exclusivity for labeling describing the expected reduction of abuse of single-entity extended-release morphine by the intranasal route due to physicochemical properties.” Following this news, Egalet stock dropped, thus damaging investors.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/eglt, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Egalet, you have until March
28, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 453861

SHAREHOLDER ALERT – Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Notifies Investors of Class Action Against Pearson plc (PSO) and Lead Plaintiff Deadline: April 25, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / March 15, 2017 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Pearson plc (“Pearson” or the “Company”) (NYSE: PSO) and certain of its officers, and is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased Pearson American Depositary Receipts between January 21, 2016 and January 17, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). Such investors are advised to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/pso.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements in a series of filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Pearson forecasted positive financial projections, stating that it expected adjusted operating profit to be at or above £800 million in 2018. The company relied on making market share gains in North American Higher Education subjects where it was launching its “next generation” courseware to reach its goal. Pearson also said that education has great growth opportunities, and that due to tight budget, Pearson was ready to deliver its financial guidance. However, the complaint alleges that Pearson officials made overly enthusiastic projections for 2017 and 2018 regarding its U.S. education business when in truth, students were not likely to purchase Pearson’s products when more affordable alternatives were available, which resulted in unsold products.

On January 18, 2017, Pearson filed its Form 6-K trading statement on for the month of January 2017 and announced that the company would not be able to meet its 2018 forecasts. Pearson mentioned “continued challenges and uncertainty in the North American higher education courseware market.” Specifically, Pearson divulged that its net revenues dropped 30% during the final quarter resulting in an unprecedented 18% drop for the full year. This decline was due mostly to lower enrollment and an accelerated impact from rental in the secondary market. Pearson also said that it was beginning 2017 with a base level of underlying profitability around £180 million lower than it had expected the previous year. Following this news, Pearson stock dropped roughly 29% to close at $7.13 per share on January 18, 2017.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, you can visit the firm’s site: http://www.bgandg.com/pso, or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in Pearson, you have until April 25, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 456261

Cognitive Computing Technology Market Synopsis, Statistical Growth Analysis, Business Trends, Key Companies Insights and Forecast to 2022

Global Cognitive Computing Technology Market Information, by Technology (Machine Learning, NLP), by Domain (SMEs, Large Business Units), by End Users (Healthcare, BFSI, IT & Telecommunication, Manufacturing, Defense) – Forecast 2016-2022

Pune, India – March 15, 2017 /MarketersMedia/

Market Synopsis of Global Cognitive Computing Technology

Market Overview:

Cognitive computing is a modern technology, which simulates the process of human thoughts into computerized model. This technology is capable of self-learning which uses the gestures, patterns recognition, data mining and NLP (Natural Language Processing) to act like a human brain. Industries are using cognitive computing technology with big data analytics to get the better and accurate output.

Latest Industry News:

• In September 2016, IBM announced the partnership with MIT for the development of cognitive computing.
• In May 2015, PTC announced the acquisition of ColdLight a leader in the big data analytics and big data learning.

Market Segments:

• Segmentation by Technology: Machine Learning, NLP (Natural Language Processing) among others.
• Segmentation by Domain: SMEs and Large Business Units.
• Segmentation by End Users: Healthcare, BFSI, IT & Telecommunication, Manufacturing, Defence, Retail among others.

Request Sample Copy of Report @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/1533

Cognitive Computing Technology Market Key players:

The key players in the market of cognitive computing technology are-

• IBM (U.S.)
• Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP (U.S.)
• Microsoft (U.S.), Oracle Corporation (U.S.)
• SAP SE (Germany)
• SAS Institute Inc. (U.S.), Numenta (U.S.)
• Enterra Solutions LLC (U.S.)
• PTC (U.S.)
• Palantir (U.S.)

Access the market data and information presented through data tables and figures spread 110 pages of the project report “Global Cognitive Computing Technology Market

Browse Report Details @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/cognitive-computing-technology-market

Brief Table of Contents for Global Cognitive Computing Technology Market:

1. Report prologue

2. Introduction

2.1 Definition
2.2 Scope of the study
2.2.1 Research objective
2.2.2 Assumptions
2.2.3 Limitations
2.3 Market structure

3. Research Methodology

3.1 Research process
3.2 Primary research
3.3 Secondary research
3.4 Market size estimation
3.5 Forecast model

4. Market Dynamics

4.1 Drivers
4.2 Restraints
4.3 Opportunities

5. Market factor analysis

5.1 Value chain analysis
5.2 Porters five forces

6. Global Cognitive Computing Technology Market: By Technology

7. Global Cognitive Computing Technology Market: By Domain

8. Global Cognitive Computing Technology Market: By End User

9. Global Cognitive Computing Technology Market, by Region

CONTINUED…

Get In-depth Table of Contents (TOC), List of Table and Figures of Report @ https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/request-toc/1533

About Market Research Future:

At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research & Consulting Services.

MRFR team have supreme objective to provide the optimum quality market research and intelligence services to our clients. Our market research studies by products, services, technologies, applications, end users, and market players for global, regional, and country level market segments, enable our clients to see more, know more, and do more, which help to answer all their most important questions.

In order to stay updated with technology and work process of the industry, MRFR often plans & conducts meet with the industry experts and industrial visits for its research analyst members.

Contact Info:
Name: Akash Anand
Email: akash.anand@marketresearchfuture.com
Organization: Market Research Future (MRFR)
Address: Office No. 528, Amanora Chambers Magarpatta Road, Hadapsar, Pune – 411028 Maharashtra, India
Phone: +1 646 845 9312

Source URL: http://marketersmedia.com/cognitive-computing-technology-market-synopsis-statistical-growth-analysis-business-trends-key-companies-insights-and-forecast-to-2022/178091

For more information, please visit https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/cognitive-computing-technology-market

Source: MarketersMedia

Release ID: 178091