Monthly Archives: June 2017

MONDAY DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces a Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Sunrun Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

IRVINE, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 30, 2017 / Khang & Khang LLP (the “Firm”) announces a securities class action lawsuit against Sunrun Inc. (“Sunrun” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: RUN). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares from September 16, 2015 to May 2, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the Firm by the July 3, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline.

If you purchased Sunrun securities during the Class Period, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., of Khang & Khang LLP, 18101 Von Karman Avenue, 3rd Floor, Irvine, CA 92612, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at joon@khanglaw.com.

There has been no class certification in this case yet. Until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You may also choose to take no action and remain a passive class member.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Sunrun made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: the Company failed to adequately reveal how many customers canceled contracts after signing up for its home solar energy system; that discovery of this conduct would subject the Company to heightened regulatory scrutiny and potential civil sanctions; and that as a result of the above, Sunrun’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On May 3, 2017, The Wall Street Journal reported that Sunrun was the subject of a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) probe and according to a person familiar with the investigation, “[t]he SEC recently issued a subpoena to Sunrun and interviewed current and former employees about the adequacy of its disclosures on account cancellations.” Following this news, Sunrun’s stock price fell materially, which harmed investors according to the Complaint.

If you want to learn more about this lawsuit, or if you have any questions about this notice or your rights, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., a prominent litigator for almost two decades, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at joon@khanglaw.com.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in certain jurisdictions.

Contact:

Joon M. Khang, Esq.
Telephone: 949-419-3834
Facsimile: 949-225-4474
joon@khanglaw.com

SOURCE: Khang & Khang LLP

ReleaseID: 467285

DEADLINE MONDAY: Khang & Khang LLP Announces a Securities Class Action Lawsuit against KBR, Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

IRVINE, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 30, 2017 / Khang & Khang LLP (the “Firm”) announces a securities class action lawsuit against KBR, Inc. (“KBR” or the “Company”) (NYSE: KBR). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired KBR shares from February 26, 2016 through April 27, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the Firm by the July 3, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline.

If you purchased KBR shares during the Class Period, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., of Khang & Khang LLP, 18101 Von Karman Avenue, 3rd Floor, Irvine, CA 92612, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at joon@khanglaw.com.

There has been no class certification in this case yet, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You may also choose to take no action and remain a passive class member.

The Complaint states that during the Class Period, KBR made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that the Company’s United Kingdom (“UK”) subsidiaries violated applicable bribery and corruption laws. On April 28, 2017, the U.K.’s Serious Fraud Office confirmed that it had opened an investigation into the activities of KBR’s U.K. subsidiaries for suspected bribery and corruption. When this information reached the public, KBR’s stock price dropped materially, which caused investors harm according to the Complaint.

If you wish to learn more about this lawsuit, or if you have any questions about this notice or your rights, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., a prominent litigator for nearly two decades, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at joon@khanglaw.com.

This press release may constitute Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions.

Contact:

Joon M. Khang, Esq.
Telephone: 949-419-3834
Facsimile: 949-225-4474
joon@khanglaw.com

SOURCE: Khang & Khang LLP

ReleaseID: 467283

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of PCM, Inc. – PCMI

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / June 30, 2017 / Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of PCM, Inc. (“PCM” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: PCMI). Such investors are advised to contact Robert S. Willoughby at rswilloughby@pomlaw.com or 888-476-6529, ext. 9980.

The investigation concerns whether PCM and certain of its officers and/or directors have engaged in securities fraud or other unlawful business practices.

[Click here to join a class action]

On March 16, 2015, PCM issued a press release announcing that the Company had entered into an agreement to acquire the assets of En Pointe Technologies Sales, Inc. (“En Pointe”). On May 2, 2017, SeekingAlpha published an article discussing a lawsuit between En Pointe’s previous owner and PCM, reporting, in relevant part, that PCM had alleged in the lawsuit that En Pointe’s financial statements had materially overstated the profitability of the business.

On this news, PCM’s share price fell $2.05, or more than 8%, to close at $22.30 on May 2, 2017.

The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, Florida, and Los Angeles, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 80 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomerantzlaw.com.

SOURCE: Pomerantz LLP

ReleaseID: 467277

MONDAY DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

IRVINE, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 30, 2017 / Khang & Khang LLP (the “Firm”) announces a securities class action lawsuit against Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (“Anadarko” or the “Company”) (NYSE: APC). Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares between February 17, 2016 and May 2, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the Firm by the July 3, 2017 lead plaintiff motion deadline.

If you purchased Anadarko shares during the Class Period, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., of Khang & Khang LLP, 18101 Von Karman Avenue, 3rd Floor, Irvine, CA 92612, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at joon@khanglaw.com.

There has been no class certification in this case yet, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. You may also choose to take no action and remain a passive class member.

According to the Complaint, during the Class Period, Anadarko made false/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose: that the Company’s maintenance and safety protocols regarding some of its vertical wells were inadequate; that due to those shortcomings, these wells were at an increased risk of explosion; and that as a result of the above, Anadarko’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On April 17, 2017, a fatal explosion killed two people and critically injured another in a home located within 170 feet of an Anadarko well. On April 26, 2017, The Denver Post reported that Anadarko “plans to shut down 3,000 vertical wells in northeastern Colorado” following the April 17 explosion. On May 2, 2017, the Frederick-Firestone Fire Protection District concluded that the deadly home explosion on April 17 was due to a faulty gas line connected to an Anadarko well. When this news went public, the Company’s share price decreased materially, which caused investors harm.

If you wish to learn more about this lawsuit, or if you have questions about this notice or your rights, please contact Joon M. Khang, Esq., a prominent litigator for nearly two decades, by telephone at (949) 419-3834, or by e-mail at joon@khanglaw.com.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in certain jurisdictions.

Contact:

Joon M. Khang, Esq.
Telephone: 949-419-3834
Facsimile: 949-225-4474
joon@khanglaw.com

SOURCE: Khang & Khang LLP

ReleaseID: 467284

EQUITY ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Shareholders of Hongli Clean Energy Technologies Corp. of a Class Action Lawsuit and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of July 7, 2017 – CETC

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / June 30, 2017 / The following statement is being issued by Levi & Korsinsky, LLP:

To: All persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of Hongli Clean Energy Technologies Corp. (“Hongli”) (NASDAQ: CETC) between October 13, 2015 and April 7, 2017. You are hereby notified that a securities class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. To get more information, go to: http://www.zlk.com/pslra-sb/hongli-clean-energy-technologies-corp?wire=1, or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at jlevi@levikorsinsky.com or by telephone at (212) 363-7500, toll-free: (877) 363-5972. There is no cost or obligation to you.

The complaint alleges that, throughout the class period, Defendants issued materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Hongli did not properly record the impairment of its assets; and (2) as a result, Hongli’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On April 21, 2017, Hongli revealed that it dismissed KSP Group, Inc. (“KSP”) as its independent auditor and stated that KSP had no disagreements with Hongli as to its accounting practices. On April 26, 2017, however, Hongli disclosed that KSP believed a disagreement did exist at the time Hongli dismissed it.

If you suffered a loss in Hongli, you have until July 7, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm’s attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
30 Broad Street – 24th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Toll Free: (877) 363-5972
Fax: (212) 363-7171
www.zlk.com

SOURCE: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP

ReleaseID: 467281

RHHBY INVESTOR ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Notifies Investors of a Class Action Involving Roche Holding AG and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of August 7, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / June 30, 2017 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of investors who purchased Roche Holding AG (“Roche Holding”) (OTCQX: RHHBY) securities between March 2, 2017 and June 5, 2017.

Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sa/roche-holding-ag?wire=1. There is no cost or obligation to you.

According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period, the Company issued materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the combination of Perjeta and Herceptin is only marginally more effective than Herceptin alone in preventing breast cancer; and (2) as a result, Defendants’ statements about Roche Holding AG’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

If you suffered a loss in Roche Holding, you have until August 7, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email vw@wongesq.com, by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sa/roche-holding-ag?wire=1.

Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:

Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: vw@wongesq.com

SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong

ReleaseID: 467275

Phoenix AZ Mold Removal Remediation Cleanup Home & Business Services Launched

ASAP Restoration, a professional mold removal company based in Phoenix, Arizona, launched updated services for home and business owners in Phoenix, Scottsdale and the surrounding area. The company works with professional environmental hygienists, accredited labs and expert mold technicians to provide effective mold removal services.

Phoenix AZ Mold Removal Remediation Cleanup Home & Business Services Launched

Scottsdale, United States – June 30, 2017 /NewsNetwork/

ASAP Restoration, a mold removal and home improvement company based in Phoenix, announced an updated range of mold removal and remediation services for commercial and residential clients in the Phoenix metropolitan area, Scottsdale, Glendale and the surrounding areas. The company works with licensed and certified mold experts to remove existing mold growth and prevent future accumulations.

More information can be found at http://naturalmoldremoval.com.

Mold removal services are essential for home and business owners looking to minimize the health risks associated with indoor mold accumulations. Health issues associated with mold growth range from skin rashes to asthma and sever respiratory problems, making mold removal a key part for the health and comfort of the residents.

ASAP Restoration is a professional mold removal contractor based in Phoenix. To help residential and commercial clients handle mold accumulations as effectively as possible, the company has recently updated its mold removal services according to the latest industry developments.

Each intervention is preceded by a careful examination of the infected area to determine the most appropriate type of intervention. The company uses professional lab tests to identify the type of mold and devise an effective intervention plan that both eliminates existing colonies and reduces the risks of future mold growth.

ASAP Restoration partnered with professional environmental hygienists and licensed labs to ensure safe and reliable services for commercial and residential clients. This is part of the company’s efforts to become the leading mold removal contractor in the Phoenix area, using state-of-the-art technology and working exclusively with licensed and certified mold removal professionals.

To help clients recover the mold removal costs, the company also provides complete legal insurance consultation services.

ASAP Restoration is available 24/7 for clients in Phoenix, Scottsdale, Glendale, Tempe, Avondale, Peoria and other areas.

Interested parties can find more information by visiting the above-mentioned website.

Contact Info:
Name: Joshua Rudin
Organization: ASAP Restoration, LLC
Address: 20701 North Scottsdale Road, AZ 85255, United States
Phone: +1-602-515-7918

For more information, please visit http://www.asaprestoration247.com

Source: NewsNetwork

Release ID: 213168

AKG SHAREHOLDER ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of Commencement of a Class Action Involving Asanko Gold Inc. and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of July 31, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / June 30, 2017 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York on behalf of investors who purchased Asanko Gold Inc. (“Asanko Gold”) (NYSE MKT: AKG) securities between October 24, 2014 and May 31, 2017.

Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sa/asanko-gold-inc?wire=1. There is no cost or obligation to you.

According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period, the Company issued materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company’s Mineral Resource Estimates are flawed; (2) some of the Company’s resources models show signs that they have been “smeared,” which would cause estimates of their ore contents to be inflated; and (3) as a result, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading.

If you suffered a loss in Asanko Gold, you have until July 31, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email vw@wongesq.com, by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sa/asanko-gold-inc?wire=1.

Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:

Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: vw@wongesq.com

SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong

ReleaseID: 467274

ESSI SHAREHOLDER ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of a Class Action Involving Eco Science Solutions, Inc. and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of July 24, 2017

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / June 30, 2017 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of investors who purchased Eco Science Solutions, Inc. (“Eco Science Solutions”) (OTC PINK: ESSI) securities between May 1, 2017 and May 19, 2017.

Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sa/eco-science-solutions-inc?wire=1. There is no cost or obligation to you.

According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period, the Company issued materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company’s plan for strategic acquisitions lacked veracity; and (ii) as a result, Defendants’ statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. On May 19, 2017, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued an order of suspension of trading, halting trading of the Company’s securities.

If you suffered a loss in Eco Science Solutions, you have until July 24, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email vw@wongesq.com, by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sa/eco-science-solutions-inc?wire=1.

Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:

Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: vw@wongesq.com

SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong

ReleaseID: 467273

Smokeless Tobacco Market 2017 Global Analysis, Opportunities and Forecast To 2022

Smokeless Tobacco -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis of Top Key Player Forecast To 2022

Pune , India – June 30, 2017 /MarketersMedia/

Smokeless Tobacco Industry

Description

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Smokeless Tobacco -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis of Top Key Player Forecast To 2022” To Its Research Database

Global Smokeless Tobacco market competition by top manufacturers/players, with Smokeless Tobacco sales volume, Price (USD/MT), revenue (Million USD) and market share for each manufacturer/player; the top players including

Altria Group
British American Tobacco
Imperial Tobacco Group
Gallaher Group Plc
Universal Corporation
Reynolds Tobacco Company

Request for Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/937348-global-smokeless-tobacco-sales-market-report-2017

Geographically, this report split global into several key Regions, with sales (K MT), revenue (Million USD), market share and growth rate of Smokeless Tobacco for these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering
United States
China
Europe
Japan
Southeast Asia
India

On the basis of product, this report displays the sales volume (K MT), revenue (Million USD), product price (USD/MT), market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into
Snuff
Dipping Tobacco
Chewing Tobacco
Others

On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, sales volume, market share and growth rate of Smokeless Tobacco for each application, including
Personal
Commercial

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

Leave a Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/937348-global-smokeless-tobacco-sales-market-report-2017

Table of Contents

Global Smokeless Tobacco Sales Market Report 2017
1 Smokeless Tobacco Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Smokeless Tobacco
1.2 Classification of Smokeless Tobacco by Product Category
1.2.1 Global Smokeless Tobacco Market Size (Sales) Comparison by Type (2012-2022)
1.2.2 Global Smokeless Tobacco Market Size (Sales) Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016
1.2.3 Snuff
1.2.4 Dipping Tobacco
1.2.5 Chewing Tobacco
1.2.6 Others
1.3 Global Smokeless Tobacco Market by Application/End Users
1.3.1 Global Smokeless Tobacco Sales (Volume) and Market Share Comparison by Application (2012-2022)
1.3.2 Personal
1.3.3 Commercial
1.4 Global Smokeless Tobacco Market by Region
1.4.1 Global Smokeless Tobacco Market Size (Value) Comparison by Region (2012-2022)
1.4.2 United States Smokeless Tobacco Status and Prospect (2012-2022)
1.4.3 China Smokeless Tobacco Status and Prospect (2012-2022)
1.4.4 Europe Smokeless Tobacco Status and Prospect (2012-2022)
1.4.5 Japan Smokeless Tobacco Status and Prospect (2012-2022)
1.4.6 Southeast Asia Smokeless Tobacco Status and Prospect (2012-2022)
1.4.7 India Smokeless Tobacco Status and Prospect (2012-2022)
1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Smokeless Tobacco (2012-2022)
1.5.1 Global Smokeless Tobacco Sales and Growth Rate (2012-2022)
1.5.2 Global Smokeless Tobacco Revenue and Growth Rate (2012-2022)

9 Global Smokeless Tobacco Players/Suppliers Profiles and Sales Data
9.1 Altria Group
9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
9.1.2 Smokeless Tobacco Product Category, Application and Specification
9.1.2.1 Product A
9.1.2.2 Product B
9.1.3 Altria Group Smokeless Tobacco Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)
9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview
9.2 British American Tobacco
9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
9.2.2 Smokeless Tobacco Product Category, Application and Specification
9.2.2.1 Product A
9.2.2.2 Product B
9.2.3 British American Tobacco Smokeless Tobacco Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)
9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview
9.3 Imperial Tobacco Group
9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
9.3.2 Smokeless Tobacco Product Category, Application and Specification
9.3.2.1 Product A
9.3.2.2 Product B
9.3.3 Imperial Tobacco Group Smokeless Tobacco Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)
9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview
9.4 Gallaher Group Plc
9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
9.4.2 Smokeless Tobacco Product Category, Application and Specification
9.4.2.1 Product A
9.4.2.2 Product B
9.4.3 Gallaher Group Plc Smokeless Tobacco Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)
9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview
9.5 Universal Corporation
9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
9.5.2 Smokeless Tobacco Product Category, Application and Specification
9.5.2.1 Product A
9.5.2.2 Product B
9.5.3 Universal Corporation Smokeless Tobacco Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)
9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview
9.6 Reynolds Tobacco Company
9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
9.6.2 Smokeless Tobacco Product Category, Application and Specification
9.6.2.1 Product A
9.6.2.2 Product B
9.6.3 Reynolds Tobacco Company Smokeless Tobacco Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)
9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview

Buy Now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=937348

Continued…                                                                                            

Contact Us: Sales@Wiseguyreports.Com Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (Us)  Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (Uk)

Contact Info:
Name: Norah Trent
Email: info@wiseguyreports.com
Organization: WISEGUY RESEARCH CONSULTANTS PVT LTD
Address: Office No. 528, Amanora Chambers Pune – 411028 Maharashtra, India
Phone: 91 841 198 5042

Source URL: http://marketersmedia.com/smokeless-tobacco-market-2017-global-analysis-opportunities-and-forecast-to-2022/213126

For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/937348-global-smokeless-tobacco-sales-market-report-2017

Source: MarketersMedia

Release ID: 213126