Monthly Archives: July 2019

El Dorado Hills Marketing Agency Announced as Digital Marketer Certified Trainer

El Dorado Hills, California, based digital marketing agency Happy T-Rex & Direct Sales Marketer is proud to announce that it is now one of the few Digital Marketer-Certified Trainers worldwide. The digital expert strives to provide clients with effective digital marketing solutions and training opportunities.

El Dorado Hills, United States – July 26, 2019 /PressCable/

Happy T-Rex & Direct Sales Marketer, a digital marketing agency based in El Dorado Hills, California, announced that it is now one of only a handful of Digital Marketer Certified Trainers worldwide. The agency provides comprehensive digital marketing solutions to brands and businesses, both large and small, interested in generating more leads and strengthening their presence online, in addition the Agency’s can now offer certification in 8 Key Marketing Disciplines, Workshops and more from the leading Marketing Training Provider digitialmarketer.com

More information can be found at http://www.directsalesmarketer.com

All business owners understand the importance of increasing brand awareness and attracting new clients. However, without active lead generation efforts, it could be very difficult to grow and scale one’s current business.

No matter one’s industry, lead generation is essential for a company’s overall success, and it can help one attract the right clients at the right time.

Happy T-Rex & Direct Sales Marketer understands how to incorporate social media channels and different lead generation techniques. The Digital Marketer Certified Trainer blends effective social media marketing techniques with lead generation techniques to improve each client’s credibility and trust, and then use the opportunity to convert the leads easily.

The company offers end-to-end social media lead generation services to their clients by implementing only genuine and authentic tactics and strategies to improve their brand recognition and awareness. Their efforts will help businesses to get more genuine leads through various social media channels.

Whether the client runs a big corporation or just a small venture, the digital experts at Happy T-Rex & Direct Sales Marketer can bring it to success.

As a Digital Marketer Certified Trainer, the agency can provide a range of strategic, creative and cost effective services that are remarkably effective, regardless of the sector or size of the business. Happy T-Rex & Direct Sales Marketer will handle all the hard work thus allowing clients to focus on growing their business and get the recognition they deserve.

Interested parties can find more by visiting the above-mentioned website or emailing steve@directsalesmarketer.com.

Contact Info:
Name: Steve Andrews
Email: Send Email
Organization: Happy T-Rex & Direct Sales Marketer
Address: 220 Gamay Place, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762, United States
Website: http://www.directsalesmarketer.com

Source: PressCable

Release ID: 88901327

ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Reminds Cloudera, Inc. Investors of Important AUGUST 6TH Deadline in Securities Class Action Lawsuit – CLDR

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 26, 2019 / Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of Cloudera, Inc. (NYSE: CLDR) from April 28, 2017 through June 5, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important August 6, 2019 lead plaintiff deadline in the securities class action lawsuit. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Cloudera investors under the federal securities laws.

To join the Cloudera class action, go http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1596.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. AN INVESTOR’S ABILITY TO SHARE IN ANY POTENTIAL FUTURE RECOVERY IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON SERVING AS LEAD PLAINTIFF.

According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Cloudera was finding it increasingly difficult to identify large enterprises interested in adopting Cloudera’s Hadoop-based platform; (2) Cloudera needed to expend an increasing amount of capital on sales and marketing activities to generate new revenues; (3) Cloudera had materially diminished sales opportunities and prospects and could not generate annual positive cash flows for the foreseeable future; (4) the primary motivation for Cloudera’s merger with Hortonworks was to generate growth through the acquisition of Hortonworks’ existing customers (as opposed to obtaining them organically); (5) the purported synergies and other benefits of the merger with Hortonworks were materially overstated; and (6) defendants’ positive statements about Cloudera’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 6, 2019. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1596.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim, Esq. of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 3 each year since 2013. Rosen Law Firm has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

——————————-

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
cases@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE: Rosen Law Firm

ReleaseID: 553555

ROSEN, A LEADING FIRM , Reminds Pyxus International Inc. Investors of Important AUGUST 6th Deadline in Securities Class Action Lawsuit – PYX

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 26, 2019 / Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of Pyxus International Inc. (NYSE: PYX) from June 7, 2018 through November 8, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important August 6, 2019 lead plaintiff deadline in the securities class action lawsuit. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Pyxus investors under the federal securities laws.

To join the Pyxus class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1595.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. AN INVESTOR’S ABILITY TO SHARE IN ANY POTENTIAL FUTURE RECOVERY IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON SERVING AS LEAD PLAINTIFF.

According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Pyxus was experiencing longer shipping cycles; (2) Pyxus’ financial results would be materially affected; (3) Pyxus lacked adequate internal controls over financial reporting; (4) Pyxus’ accounting policies were reasonably likely to lead to regulatory scrutiny; and (5) defendants’ positive statements about Pyxus’ business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 6, 2019. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1595.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim, Esq. of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 3 each year since 2013. Rosen Law Firm has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

——————————-

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
cases@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE: Rosen Law Firm

ReleaseID: 553550

ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Reminds Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. Investors of Deadline in First Filed Securities Class Action Lawsuit Commenced by the Firm – TUSK

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 26, 2019 / Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NYSE: TUSK) from October 19, 2017 through June 5, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important August 6, 2019 lead plaintiff deadline in securities class action commenced by the firm. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Mammoth investors under the federal securities laws.

To join the Mammoth class action, go to https://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1587.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. AN INVESTOR’S ABILITY TO SHARE IN ANY POTENTIAL FUTURE RECOVERY IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON SERVING AS LEAD PLAINTIFF.

According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Mammoth’s subsidiary, Cobra, improperly obtained two infrastructure contracts with the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority that totaled over $1.8 billion; (2) specifically, the contracts were awarded as the result of improper steering and not a competitive Request for Proposal process; and (3) as a result, defendants’ statements about Mammoth’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 6, 2019. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to https://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1587.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 3 each year since 2013. Rosen Law Firm has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee future outcomes.

——————————-

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
cases@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE: Rosen Law Firm

ReleaseID: 553546

ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Reminds A.O. Smith Corporation Investors of Important JULY 29TH Deadline in Securities Class Action Lawsuit – AOS

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 26, 2019 / Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of A.O. Smith Corporation (NYSE: AOS) from July 26, 2016 through May 16, 2019, inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the important July 29, 2019 lead plaintiff deadline in the class action. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for A.O. Smith investors under the federal securities laws.

To join the A.O. Smith class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1575.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com for information on the class action.

NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. AN INVESTOR’S ABILITY TO SHARE IN ANY POTENTIAL FUTURE RECOVERY IS NOT DEPENDENT UPON SERVING AS LEAD PLAINTIFF.

According to the lawsuit, defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) A.O. Smith had undisclosed business connections and entanglements with Jiangsu UTP Supply Chain (“UTP”) through which it funneled up to 75% of its China product sales; (2) A.O. Smith had used UTP to engage in channel stuffing by artificially inflating inventories purportedly sold through distributors that were not based on consumer demand, thereby approximately doubling the normal level of inventory at such distributors; (3) A.O. Smith had used its UTP relationship to artificially inflate the sales figures it reported to investors by as much as 8% and to conceal worsening sales trends that A.O. Smith was experiencing in China; (4) A.O. Smith’s sales growth had been primarily in lower margin products as its higher priced products were being undercut by competition in “second-tier” Chinese cities, causing the Company to experience significant market pressures; (5) A.O. Smith had increased its cash reserves in China to over $530 million in furtherance of its channel stuffing and sales manipulation scheme, encumbering A.O. Smith’s ability to repatriate the cash for use for capital expenditures; and (6) as a result, A.O. Smith’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.

A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 29, 2019. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-register-1575.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim, Esq. of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at pkim@rosenlegal.com or cases@rosenlegal.com.

Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.

Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 3 each year since 2013. Rosen Law Firm has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee future outcomes.

——————————-

Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
lrosen@rosenlegal.com
pkim@rosenlegal.com
cases@rosenlegal.com
www.rosenlegal.com

SOURCE: Rosen Law Firm PA

ReleaseID: 553545

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS INVESTOR ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $50,000 Investing In Intelligent Systems Corporation To Contact The Firm

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 16, 2019 / Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Intelligent Systems Corporation (“Intelligent Systems” or the “Company”) (NYSE:INS).

If you invested in Intelligent Systems stock or options and would like to discuss your legal rights, click here: www.faruqilaw.com/INS. There is no cost or obligation to you.

You can also contact us by calling Richard Gonnello toll free at 877-247-4292 or at 212-983-9330 or by sending an e-mail to rgonnello@faruqilaw.com.

CONTACT:
FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Attn: Richard Gonnello, Esq.
rgonnello@faruqilaw.com
Telephone: (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

ReleaseID: 553540

LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $50,000 In Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV To Contact The Firm

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 26, 2019 / Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, reminds investors in Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (“Anheuser-Busch” or the “Company”) (NYSE: BUD) of the August 20, 2019 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

If you invested in Anheuser-Busch stock or options between March 1, 2018 and October 24, 2018 and would like to discuss your legal rights, click here: www.faruqilaw.com/BUD. There is no cost or obligation to you.

You can also contact us by calling Richard Gonnello toll free at 877-247-4292 or at 212-983-9330 or by sending an e-mail to rgonnello@faruqilaw.com.

CONTACT:
FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Attn: Richard Gonnello, Esq.
rgonnello@faruqilaw.com
Telephone: (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330

The lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of all those who American Depositary Shares (“ADS”), each of which represents one of the Company’s ordinary shares, between March 1, 2018 and October 24, 2018 (the “Class Period”). The case, City of Sterling Heights General Employees’ Retirement System v. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, No. 1:19-cv-05854 was filed on June 21, 2019 and has been assigned to judge Alvin K. Hellerstein.

The lawsuit focuses on whether the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and/or failing to disclose adverse information regarding Anheuser-Busch’s business, operations and prospects. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that defendants failed to disclose, among other things, that cost-cutting measures the Company had put in place had run their course; the devaluation of key emerging market currencies and input cost inflation was having a material adverse effect on the Company’s margins, EBITDA and profitability; Anheuser-Busch had been experiencing less than expected growth and profits in certain key markets; Anheuser-Busch was not going to be able to maintain its then current dividend and still meet its deleveraging targets; and Anheuser-Busch was at risk of having its credit ratings downgraded. As a result of this information being withheld from the market, the price of Anheuser-Busch ADSs was artificially inflated to as high as $117 per ADS during the Class Period.

On October 25, 2018, the Company reported its financial results for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2018, announcing that it had cut its dividend by 50% to “accelerate deleveraging toward our optimal capital structure of around 2x net debt to EBITDA ratio.”

On this news, Anheuser-Busch share price fell from $82.25 per share on October 24, 2018 to $74.54 per share on October 25, 2018-a drop of $7.71 or 9.37%.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Anheuser-Busch conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

ReleaseID: 553544

HELIUS INVESTOR ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $50,000 Investing In Helius Medical Technologies, Inc. To Contact The Firm

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 26, 2019 / Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Helius Medical Technologies, Inc. (“Helius” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:HSDT).

If you invested in Helius stock or options and would like to discuss your legal rights, click here: www.faruqilaw.com/HSDT. There is no cost or obligation to you.

You can also contact us by calling Richard Gonnello toll free at 877-247-4292 or at 212-983-9330 or by sending an e-mail to rgonnello@faruqilaw.com.

CONTACT:
FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Attn: Richard Gonnello, Esq.
rgonnello@faruqilaw.com
Telephone: (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

ReleaseID: 553539

LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $50,000 In Cloudera, Inc. To Contact The Firm

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 26, 2019 / Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, reminds investors in Cloudera, Inc. (“Cloudera” or the “Company”) (NYSE: CLDR) of the August, 6, 2019 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

If you invested in Cloudera stock between April 28, 2019 and June 5, 2019 and would like to discuss your legal rights, click here: www.faruqilaw.com/CLDR. There is no cost or obligation to you.

You can also contact us by calling Richard Gonnello toll free at 877-247-4292 or at 212-983-9330 or by sending an e-mail to rgonnello@faruqilaw.com.

CONTACT:
FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Attn: Richard Gonnello, Esq.
rgonnello@faruqilaw.com
Telephone: (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330

The lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of all those who purchased Cloudera common stock between April 28, 2017 and June 5, 2019 (the “Class Period”). The case, Christie v. Cloudera, Inc., No. 5:19-cv-03221 was filed on June 7, 2019 and has been assigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh.

The lawsuit focuses on whether the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Cloudera was finding it increasingly difficult to identify large enterprises interested in adopting the Company’s Hadoop-based platform; (2) Cloudera needed to expend an increasing amount of capital on sales and marketing activities to generate new revenues, even as new revenue opportunities were diminishing; and (3) Cloudera had materially diminished sales opportunities and prospects and could not generate annual positive cash flows.

On April 3, 2018, post-market, Cloudera issued a press release announcing its fourth quarter and fiscal year 2018 results. The Company announced a negative operating cash flow of $22 million during the quarter and provided a disappointing outlook for fiscal year 2018, with total revenues of only $435 million to $445 million, representing a sharp deceleration in growth. On an earnings call discussing the foregoing results, Cloudera revealed that a sharp slowdown in the Company’s new expansion bookings had occurred in 2018.

On this news, Cloudera’s stock price fell from $22.24 per share on April 3, 2018 to $13.29 per share on April 4, 2018- a $8.95 or 40.24% drop.

On October 3, 2018, Cloudera announced that it had entered into a definitive merger agreement with its primary competitor in the Hadoop data analytics space, Hortonworks, Inc. (the “Hortonworks Merger”). In the stock-for-stock deal, valued at $5.2 billion, Hortonworks shareholders would own 40% of the combined Company and receive 1.305 common shares of Cloudera for each share of Hortonworks stock they owned.

On March 13, 2019, post-market, Cloudera issued a press release announcing its fourth quarter and fiscal year 2019 results, providing weak guidance for the first fiscal quarter after the completion of the Hortonworks Merger. On an earnings call to discuss the foregoing results, Cloudera’s Chief Financial Officer, Jim Frankola, revealed that the merged entity would need to take a $62 million “haircut” due to purchase price accounting adjustments and also a $28 million write-down of deferred commission expenses. Frankola further stated that differences in billing periods between the companies would reduce 2020 cash flows by $125 million as the legacy companies reconciled their billing cycles.

On this news, Cloudera’s stock price fell from $14.61 per share On March 13, 2018 to $11.71 per share on March 14, 2018- a $2.90 or 19.85% drop.

On June 5, 2019, post-market, Cloudera issued a press release announcing its financial and operating results for the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. Cloudera stated that its first-quarter revenues were $187.5 million, but that several customers had elected to “postpone renewal and expansion” of their subscription agreements. Cloudera also announced that its losses from operations had increased to $103.8 million, roughly double the year-over-year period. In addition, Cloudera revealed that its highest-spending customers were essentially flat for the quarter, that middle-spend customers had declined sequentially, and that it was suffering an elevated dollar churn rate of 15%. Cloudera also slashed its full-year outlook, reducing total revenue guidance by $90 million and stating it expected recurring revenue growth of only 0% to 10% for the year (compared to 18% to 21% in the prior issued guidance) and that it now expected to suffer a negative cash flow from operations of between $75 million and $95 million for the year, more than double the amount stated in the previously issued guidance. The same day, Cloudera announced that it’s Chief Executive Officer, Thomas J. Reilly, would be abruptly retiring from the Company.

On this news, Cloudera’s stock price fell from $8.80 per share on June 5, 2019 to $5.21 per share on June 6, 2019- a $3.59 or 40.80% drop.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Cloudera’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

ReleaseID: 553543

LEAD PLAINTIFF DEADLINE ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses Exceeding $50,000 In EQT Corporation To Contact The Firm

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 26, 2019 / Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, reminds investors in EQT Corporation (“EQT” or the “Company”) (NYSE:EQT) of the August 26, 2019 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company.

If you invested in EQT stock or options between June 19, 2017 and October 24, 2018 and would like to discuss your legal rights, click here: www.faruqilaw.com/EQT. There is no cost or obligation to you.

You can also contact us by calling Richard Gonnello toll free at 877-247-4292 or at 212-983-9330 or by sending an e-mail to rgonnello@faruqilaw.com.

CONTACT:
FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Attn: Richard Gonnello, Esq.
rgonnello@faruqilaw.com
Telephone: (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330

The lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on behalf of all those who: (1) purchased EQT common stock between June 19, 2017 and October 24, 2018 (the “Class Period”); (2) held EQT or Rice Energy, Inc. (“Rice”) shares as of the record dates of September 25, 2017, and September 21, 2017, respectively, and were entitled to vote at an EQT or Rice special meeting on November 9, 2017 with respect to EQT’s acquisition of Rice; and (3) purchased or otherwise acquired EQT common stock in exchange for their shares of Rice common stock in the Acquisition. The case, Cambridge Retirement System v. EQT Corporation, et al., No. 19-cv-00754 was filed on June 25, 2019 and has been assigned to Judge Maureen P. Kelly.

The lawsuit focuses on whether the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by misrepresenting the billions of dollars in synergies, based on purported operational benefits, that would be achieved in EQT’s acquisition of Rice, a rival gas producer. Specifically, on June 19, 2017, EQT announced that it had entered into an agreement to acquire Rice for $6.7 billion. EQT claimed that, as a result of the two companies’ contiguous acreage footprints, the merger would result in $2.5 billion in synergies, including $100 million in cost savings in 2018 alone. After the acquisition’s closing in November 2017, the Company continued to tout the “significant operational synergies” of the merger.

On October 25, 2018, Company disclosed shockingly bad financial results for the three months ended September 30, 2018. Among other things, the Company’s earnings press release issued that day stated that “[e]stimated well development capital expenditures for 2018 increased by $300 million to $2.5 billion. This was driven by inefficiencies resulting from higher activity levels, the learning curve on ultra-long laterals and service cost increases.”

After the announcement, EQT’s share price fell from $40.46 per share on October 24, 2018 to a closing price of $35.34 on October 25, 2018-a $5.12 or a 12.65% drop.

The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not.

Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding EQT’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others.

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.

SOURCE: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP

ReleaseID: 553542