Monthly Archives: July 2019

SHAREHOLDER ACTION ALERT: The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit Against Eagle Bancorp, Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / July 30, 2019 / The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (“Eagle” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: EGBN) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s shares between March 2, 2015 and July 17, 2019, inclusive (the ”Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the firm before September 23, 2019.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 424-303-1964, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Eagle failed to maintain adequate internal controls and compliance policies. This failure was likely to result in the need for internal investigations by the Company and created a risk of heightened regulatory scrutiny. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Eagle, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm
Office: 310-301-3335
Cell: 424-303-1964
info@schallfirm.com
Brian Schall, Esq.,
Rina Restaino, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com

SOURCE: The Schall Law Firm

ReleaseID: 553995

IMPORTANT INVESTOR NOTICE: The Schall Law Firm Announces it is Investigating Claims Against Just Energy Group Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / July 30, 2019 / The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces that it is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Just Energy Group Inc. (“Just Energy” or “the Company”) (NYSE: JE) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The investigation focuses on whether the Company issued false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose information pertinent to investors. Just Energy announced on July 23, 2019, that it had “identified customer enrolment and non-payment issues, primarily in Texas, over the past 12 months.” Based on these issues, the Company expects to suffer an impairment charge of CAD $45 to $50 million to its Texas residential accounts receivable. Based on this news, shares of Just Energy fell by nearly 14%.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 424-303-1964, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class in this case has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.
310-301-3335
Cell: 424-303-1964
info@schallfirm.com
www.schallfirm.com

SOURCE: The Schall Law Firm

ReleaseID: 553994

FINAL DEADLINE IMMINENT: The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit Against Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / July 30, 2019 / The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (“Mammoth” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: TUSK) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s shares between October 19, 2017 and June 5, 2019, inclusive (the ”Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the firm before August 6, 2019.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 424-303-1964, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Mammoth subsidiary Cobra was awarded two infrastructure contracts with PREPA totaling more than $1.8 billion. The contracts were obtained as the result of improper steering and were not awarded on the basis of a competitive RFP process. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Mammoth, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm
Office: 310-301-3335
Cell: 424-303-1964
info@schallfirm.com
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com

SOURCE: The Schall Law Firm

ReleaseID: 553991

DEADLINE RAPIDLY APPROACHING: The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit Against Reckitt Benckiser Group plc and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / July 30, 2019 / The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (“Reckitt” or “the Company”) (OTC PINK: RBGLY) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s American Depository Shares (“ADSs”) between July 28, 2014 and April 9, 2019, inclusive (the ”Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the firm before September 13, 2019.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 424-303-1964, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Reckitt and its senior executives developed a scheme to mislead both investors and the public about its Suboxone Film product, including health and safety risks. This scheme also facilitated the abuse of opiates by U.S. consumers. As part of the scheme, Reckitt touted the safety of the Suboxone Film product while falsely constructing safety concerns about traditional Suboxone tablets. Reckitt’s scheme enriched the company by more than $3 billion, but eventually resulted in investigations by both the DOJ and the FTC. Reckitt settled the investigations into Suboxone Film for $1.4 billion in what was called the “largest opioid settlement in US history.” Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Reckitt, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:
The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
Cell: 424-303-1964
info@schallfirm.com

SOURCE: The Schall Law Firm

ReleaseID: 553993

SHAREHOLDER ACTION NOTICE: The Schall Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit Against Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / July 30, 2019 / The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. (“Karyopharm” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: KPTI) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s shares between March 2, 2017 and February 22, 2019, inclusive (the ”Class Period”), are encouraged to contact the firm before September 23, 2019.

If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 1880 Century Park East, Suite 404, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 424-303-1964, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at www.schallfirm.com, or by email at brian@schallfirm.com.

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member.

According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Karyopharm repeatedly hyped the commercial prospects of its drug selinexor. The Company focused on the safety and efficacy of the drug, describing it as having a “predictable and manageable tolerability profile,” adding that it had a “very nice safety profile,” and was “well tolerated” by patients. In reality, the FDA found that “[t]reatment with selinexor is associated with significant toxicity” and has “limited efficacy.” Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Karyopharm, investors suffered damages.

Join the case to recover your losses.

The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.

CONTACT:

The Schall Law Firm
Brian Schall, Esq.,
www.schallfirm.com
Office: 310-301-3335
Cell: 424-303-1964
info@schallfirm.com

SOURCE: The Schall Law Firm

ReleaseID: 553992

The Klein Law Firm Reminds Investors of Class Actions on Behalf of Shareholders of BOX, ZUO and MNK

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 30, 2019 / The Klein Law Firm announces that class action complaints have been filed on behalf of shareholders of the following companies. There is no cost to participate in the suit. If you suffered a loss, you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff.

Box, Inc. (NYSE: BOX)
Class Period: November 28, 2018 to June 3, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 5, 2019

According to the complaint, Box, Inc. allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company was unable to close large deals within the quarter; (2) that, as a result, the Company’s revenue would be materially impacted; and (3) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Learn about your recoverable losses in BOX: http://www.kleinstocklaw.com/pslra-1/box-inc-loss-submission-form?id=2677&from=1.

Zuora, Inc. (NYSE: ZUO)
Class Period: April 12, 2018 to May 30, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: August 13, 2019

The lawsuit alleges that Zuora, Inc. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company would focus on implementing RevPro for new customers ahead of the deadline to comply with accounting standard ASC 606; (2) as a result, the Company lacked adequate resources to integrate RevPro with the core business; (3) the Company would focus on RevPro integration a year after the acquisition closed; (4) delays in integrating RevPro would materially impact the business; (5) the market for RevPro was limited to customers seeking to implement new accounting standards such as ASC 606; (6) after the deadline for ASC 606 compliance passed, demand for RevPro was reasonably likely to decline; and (7) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Learn about your recoverable losses in ZUO: http://www.kleinstocklaw.com/pslra-1/zuora-inc-loss-submission-form?id=2677&from=1.

Mallinckrodt Public Limited Company (NYSE: MNK)
Class Period: February 28, 2018 to July 16, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 24, 2019

Throughout the class period, Mallinckrodt Public Limited Company allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Acthar posed significant safety concerns that rendered it a non-viable treatment for ALS; (ii) accordingly, Mallinckrodt overstated the viability of Acthar as an ALS treatment; and (iii) as a result, the Company’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

Learn about your recoverable losses in MNK: http://www.kleinstocklaw.com/pslra-1/mallinckrodt-public-limited-company-loss-submission-form?id=2677&from=1.

Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. If you suffered a loss during the class period and wish to obtain additional information, please contact J. Klein, Esq. by telephone at 212-616-4899 or visit the webpages provided.

J. Klein, Esq. represents investors and participates in securities litigations involving financial fraud throughout the nation. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:

J. Klein, Esq.
Empire State Building
350 Fifth Avenue
59th Floor
New York, NY 10118
jk@kleinstocklaw.com
Telephone: (212) 616-4899
Fax: (347) 558-9665
www.kleinstocklaw.com

SOURCE: The Klein Law Firm

ReleaseID: 553989

SHAREHOLDER ALERT – 3M Company (MMM) – Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Notifies Investors of Class Action and Lead Plaintiff Deadline: September 27, 2019

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 30, 2019 / Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC notifies investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against 3M Company (“3M” or the Company”) (NYSE: MMM) and certain of its officers, on behalf of shareholders who purchased or otherwise acquired 3M securities between February 9, 2017 and May 28, 2019

both dates inclusive. Such investors are encouraged to join this case by visiting the firm’s site: www.bgandg.com/mmm.

This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The lawsuit alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that:(1) 3M’s vast internal evidence dating back decades confirmed that man-made chemicals or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) are toxic (which was first publicly revealed in February 2018 by Minnesota’s Attorney General); (2) 3M had a long history of suppressing negative information and/or damaging data about PFAS; (3) 3M had significant legal exposure to state, county, and local governments and individuals around the country as a result of its knowledge and intentional concealment of the toxic harm caused by the use of PFAS; and (4) as a result, 3M’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint you can visit the firm’s site: www.bgandg.com/mmm. or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Investor Relations Analyst, Yael Hurwitz of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss in 3Myou have until September 27, 2019 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a corporate litigation boutique. Our primary expertise is the aggressive pursuit of litigation claims on behalf of our clients. In addition to representing institutions and other investor plaintiffs in class action security litigation, the firm’s expertise includes general corporate and commercial litigation, as well as securities arbitration. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Contact:

Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Hurwitz

212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com

SOURCE: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC

ReleaseID: 553987

How To Handle Car Insurance When Moving To Another State

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / July 30, 2019 / Cheapquotesautoinsurance.com has launched a new blog post that explains the steps moving drivers are required to take if they want valid car insurance in the new state

For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://cheapquotesautoinsurance.com/necessary-steps-you-need-to-take-with-car-insurance-if-you-are-moving-to-another-state/

Updating auto insurance might be one of the last things drivers consider to do when they are moving to another state. However, updating the policy is very important and there are several important things that drivers need to keep in mind when moving to another state and several steps to take to make sure they are covered.

Drivers that are moving to a new state should follow the next steps:

Check the current policy. Drivers that are moving to another state are protected by their current insurance policy. However, drivers that are moving far away are recommended to increase their liability limits and purchase full coverage. During a long trip, drivers should also add roadside assistance.
Check if the current insurer is present in the new location. Drivers should update their policy as soon as they can after arriving at their new location. Not all insurance companies have a license to operate in all 50 states and the insurance requirements are different in all states. Drivers should contact their insurers immediately and check if they have a license to operate in their new states. If they do, drivers should keep their insurers.
Search for another provider. If the current insurer is not present in their new state, drivers should search for another provider. Drivers can contact a local car insurance agency or they can go to a large national insurance carrier. The insurance requirements are different in each state, so the insurance requirements of the new state can be different from the requirements of the old state. The new policy will also be needed to get the new license plates and vehicle registrations.
Update the license and vehicle registration. One of the last things drivers will need to do is to update their license with the local department of motor vehicles. Besides that, drivers will be required to update their car insurance policies with their new driver’s license number. Usually, insurance providers will give drivers a reasonable amount of time do this, but it’s better to do this sooner than later.

-+For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://cheapquotesautoinsurance.com/

Cheapquotesautoinsurance.com is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc.

“Moving to a new state can be an exciting thing to do for most drivers. However, drivers should not forget to update their insurance policies as soon as they arrive at their new locations”, said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company.

CONTACT: cgurgu@internetmarketingcompany.biz

SOURCE: Internet Marketing Company

ReleaseID: 553947

In a Strange Twist of Irony: Marilyn Monroe’s Statue Stolen from the Hollywood Walk of Fame; Similarly to the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce Obstructing Installation of Lyricist Leo Robin’s Star Awarded 29 Years Ago

SHERMAN OAKS, CA / ACCESSWIRE / July 30, 2019 / The Hollywood Chamber of Commerce has broken its own rules to obstruct installing Leo’s long-lost star (“#LeosLostStar”) that was awarded to the lyricist, Leo Robin, 29 years ago. Leo Robin Music is saddened to hear that the Marilyn Monroe statue that sat atop a gazebo on the Hollywood Walk of Fame was stolen on June 17, 2019, coincidentally falling on the 29th anniversary, June 18, 1990, of the star awarded to Robin. Jule Styne and Leo Robin wrote the jazz song, “Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend,” that was famously performed by Marilyn in the 1953 film Gentlemen Prefer Blondes and went on to become her signature song. It’s a strange irony to see similar misfortunes on the Hollywood Walk of Fame have befallen the symbols, statue and star, of the singer and writer of this classic.

Left: Leo Robin crowns the diamond tiara on Carol Channing, who always called him Uncle Leo, during the run of the 1949 Broadway smash hit Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, which introduced her to Broadway. Right: Marilyn Monroe wore a diamond tiara in a scene from the 1953 film Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, where she rendered an iconic performance of “Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend” which went on to become her signature song.

Ashley Lee from the Los Angeles Times first broke on May 23, 2019 this intriguing story, “Leo Robin never got his Walk of Fame star. Now his grandson is fighting for it,” about his grandson’s, Scott Ora’s, serendipitous discovery of Leo’s long-lost star. Leo Robin’s wife, Cherie Robin passed away slightly more than one year before the letter was sent out from the Chamber announcing that her husband had been awarded the star and so, unfortunately, it was never installed. Unlike the Chamber, Mrs. Robin played by the rules, Ms. Lee reporting what the grandson said, “she took the time, she followed all the rules. My grandmother did everything right except live long enough.”

It has been two years, another anniv., since the grandson discovered on July 6, 2017 that Leo’s long-lost star existed and ever since, the grandson has been “tangled in a still-unresolved back-and-forth with the Walk of Fame to get it set in stone,” Ms. Lee reported. These multiple annives. are no cause for celebration but a call for action. After speaking with Ms. Martinez on this day and learning that Robin was awarded this star back in 1990, the grandson followed her instructions strictly. On July 11, 2017, he emailed Ms. Martinez, as she’d requested, a letter addressed to the Walk of Fame Committee, explaining what had happened and requesting that Robin’s 1990 posthumous star be placed on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, along with the official documents from Hillside Memorial Park to verify the date of his grandmother’s demise, proving she was no longer living when the notification letter was mailed to her.

Throughout the next year, the grandson never heard a word from Ms. Martinez despite initiating contact with her, repeatedly, via emails and phone calls but to no avail. Finally, on July 10, 2018, he emailed her again and that same day, almost exactly one year since he had last heard from her, he received an email from her. What a strange twist in irony; the Chamber, which administers this famous sidewalk landmark and usually assists honorees, performed the opposite of its mission and public expectations. Instead of assisting, the Chamber obstructed installation by ignoring emails for a whole year and failing to honor its promise for the Walk of Fame Committee to consider the grandson’s request for the star to be placed on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.

An unjust history of Leo’s long-lost star seems to be repeating itself. We remember what happened more than 29 years ago when the acceptance letter was “Return to Sender.” The Chamber made no attempt to notify the co-sponsor, Bob Hope, who was one of the most famous entertainers in the world at the time. In a press release issued by Leo Robin Music on June 26, 2019, it said this about the conduct, “What the Chamber did after the letter was “Return to Sender” was not customary practice but smacks of disregard for the individuals honored by the Walk of Fame Committee.”

After the loss of a year and the start of a conversation via emails between the grandson and the Chamber, it appeared as if the induction of Robin’s star was moving forward. On July 17, 2018, Ms. Martinez requested, “when you would like to do the ceremony and once you give me a date we can move forward.” On July 19, 2019, pursuant to Ms. Martinez’s request, the grandson sent her the date he selected in 2019 for Robin’s star ceremony, April 6th, his birthday, along with a check for $4,000, the fee that his grandmother and Bob Hope, the co-sponsors, had originally agreed to pay back in 1988.

Almost two weeks later on July 23, 2018, the discussion would break down when Ms. Martinez sent his letter to her back to him along with the check and wrote, “I received your check for $4,000 which [I] am sending back to you. The approval of Mr. Robins (sic) star lapsed many years ago. It would need to be reinstated by the Walk of Fame Committee, which will next meet in June 2019.” Leron Gubler, President & CEO of the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce, chimed in, “The earliest this can be done is at next year’s Walk of Fame Committee meeting in June 2019.” On July 30, 2018, Mr. Ora emailed Ms. Martinez, “To think that, after all of this, you would ask me to wait yet another year to have the Committee consider reinstating the star to Leo at their next meeting in June 2019 is beyond the pale.”

In the Sunday print edition of The Times issued on May 26, 2019, midway in the article “A Walk of Fame star still in limbo,” Ms. Lee posed this question to the Chamber, “It’s been decades since Robin was named to the Walk of Fame…what would it take to get the star installed? Martinez explained that Robin would need to be reinstated by the current committee at the next annual meeting. She didn’t anticipate problems with that part of the process.” This was all, apparently, an insincere PR stunt being the grandson never heard a word from the Chamber since the meeting took place in June 2019.

It was understood from the very beginning that Robin would get the traditional ceremony. “A ceremony or the fanfare that comes with the event which is why we do this,” Ms. Martinez said emphatically in an email on July 10, 2018. Mr. Ora emailed her on July 12, 2018 to confirm his desire to have a ceremony and he enthusiastically said, “I look forward to proudly attending the ceremony to celebrate my grandfather’s star with my family…We would love to be given the opportunity for the Hollywood, Broadway and jazz communities to come together…to celebrate this joyous occasion.” At this time back when the grandson chose a date for the event, the ceremony was all but certain.

Johnny Grant, who was named honorary mayor of Hollywood for life, hosted hundreds of ceremonies for celebrities inducted into the Hollywood Walk of Fame with the unveiling of the new stars on the Walk. According to The Times, he told a reporter in 1997 about the ceremony that has become a part of the tradition of getting a star, “Why don’t we really put on a big show when we have a Walk of Fame ceremony. We had planes fly over, bands, etc.” The ceremony rule, #2 on the application, provides that the “nominee guarantees to be present at the dedication ceremonies on a date and time mutually agreed upon with the Walk of Fame Committee.”

The Chamber floated a proposal through Ms. Lee, unbeknownst to her at the time, she would be the messenger. Ms. Lee reported, “At one point, it was suggested that Robin’s star be installed without the expensive fanfare, which would bring the cost closer to $10,000. But Ora says he feels Robin deserves the usual ceremony — celebrating a star on the Walk of Fame is as much a part of the honor as the star itself.” After two years of demanding a dedication ceremony, the Chamber abruptly changed course and now wants to duck its duty and deny Robin this long-standing tradition. Ms. Lee reported what Ms. Martinez said, “The fact that [Ora] wants us to place the star and do the ceremony, we just can’t do it. We want to work with him, but he’s gotta work with us.” While the Chamber is playing ducks and drakes with the grandson, they’re squandering time, their prestige and reputation.

Bob Hope, who has four stars on the Hollywood Walk of Fame and sponsored Robin for a star, and Grant, who has two stars himself and was Chairman of the 1990 Walk of Fame Committee and signed the acceptance letter addressed to Mrs. Robin, are championing, cheering and smiling down on the Chamber to honor the decision made by the Committee to award Robin a star. Grant was proud of his mission in life of bringing the Hollywood story to everyone and in 1987, the town’s centennial year, he told Times columnist Jack Smith about Hollywood, “It’s a magic word all over the world.” There is no more time for the Chamber to play games with the grandson. Now is the time for the Chamber to preserve the Hollywood magic and put Leo’s long-lost star in its rightful place on the Hollywood Walk of Fame!

For more information, visit the Newsroom at the official website of Leo Robin at http://leorobin.com/.

About Leo Robin Music

Leo Robin Music owns the copyrights of songs written by Leo Robin, who was known as the “Dean of Lyric Writers.” He created lyrics that have inspired popular music and become part of the fabric of our culture. Considered to be one of the most influential songwriters of the 20th Century, he wrote many of the country’s most popular jazz standards including “Blue Hawaii,” “Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend,” “Easy Living,” “If I Should Lose You,” “My Ideal,” “Prisoner of Love” and “Thanks for the Memory.”

CONTACT:

Scott D. Ora
President – Leo Robin Music
thanks4thememory@icloud.com
(818) 618-2572
Leo Robin (@LeoRobinMusic) / Twitter

SOURCE: Leo Robin Music

ReleaseID: 553423

WIMI, China’s Holographic AR Company, will land on NASDAQ on August 1st

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / July 30, 2019 / WiMi Hologram Cloud recently filed an updated prospectus with the SEC indicating that WIMI will officially land on the NASDAQ exchange on August 1st, 2019.

WIMI is focused on the field of holographic AR. The company plans to improve and strengthen existing technologies, maintaining the leading position in the industry and create an ecological business model. At present, WIMI’s holographic facial recognition technology and holographic face changing technology are being applied to the existing holographic advertising and entertainment business. And the technology is also being upgraded in order to make breakthroughs in more industry fields. WIMI aims at building a commercial ecosystem based on holographic technology application.

As shown in the IPO prospectus that the services of the company will be deeply combined with 5G. Under the cooperation of 5G with high rate and low delay, it makes the average transmission delay is about 6ms in terms of remote communication, data transmission as well as from system terminal to service server, which is much lower than 4G network transmission delay. It truly ensures the richness and diversity of holographic AR remote communication and data transmission without stuttering and low delay, and the richness and diversity of interaction in term of multi-terminal cooperation in different places. It makes the collaboration of port + cloud collaboration more efficient. Based on 5G AI face recognition technology and holographic AI DeepFake technology, the application of the enhanced mobile broadband (EMBB) and Internet of things (IOT) has made plenty of holographic services of the WIMI to be achieved with effective growth, such as holographic AR advertising business, holographic AR entertainment business, holographic interactive entertainment, holographic conference, holographic social contact, holographic communication, holographic home hologram and so on. * Source: U.S. SEC – FORM F-1, WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc., Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The Holographic industry has broad prospects and great potential, and there will be explosive growth in the future. China’s holographic market is expected to exceed 450 billion yuan, the holographic cloud sector will grow at 78 percent a year, the global holographic market is expected to exceed $500 billion, and the holographic cloud sector will grow at 68 percent a year by 2025. On the whole, WIMI is focused on software and content, has the first mover advantages. Under the increase of the number of users and the unit price of customers, it realizes the rapid growth of performance, and leads the opponent in terms of patent, content quantity and quantity of software copyright, all of which shows its obvious advantage. It is expected that it will detonate the listing.

* Source: U.S. SEC – FORM F-1, WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc., Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Media Contact

Name: Tim Wong
Email: bjoverseasnews@gmail.com
Tele: +86 10 89913328

SOURCE: WiMi

ReleaseID: 553949