Natural Cycles, the first and only FDA-cleared Digital Birth Control, announces findings of new study surrounding correct fertile window identification

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 19, 2019 / It's estimated that over 200 million people have now downloaded period tracking apps, as reported by British public service broadcaster, the BBC. As so-called period trackers continue to rise in popularity, so, according to Natural Cycles, does the need for women to understand the differences between the hundreds of options on the market, as well as how they differ from digital birth control. It's with this in mind that the company, responsible for the first and only app to be FDA-cleared and EU-certified as a contraceptive, has announced the findings of a new study surrounding correct fertile window identification.

Correct fertile window identification is vital, Natural Cycles says, in preventing pregnancy, by avoiding unprotected sex during the window, or to plan a pregnancy, by engaging in unprotected sex during the same timeframe. "Many women rely on correct fertile window identification for exactly these purposes," explains Elina Berglund, co-founder and CEO of Natural Cycles.

Two commonly used approaches recognized by the World Health Organization employed to identify this window are known as the 'rhythm' and 'standard days' methods. "These methods have been around for many years," suggests Berglund. Some women, she says, calculate the window on their own, or using period trackers, while others rely on the window that their period tracker or fertility tracker calculates for them, often based on these methods.

What, then, did the Natural Cycles correct fertile window identification study find? The Natural Cycles study, published in the peer-reviewed medical journal, the European Journal of Reproductive Healthcare & Contraception, analyzed data from over 42,000 women and more than 280,000 menstrual cycles found a significant discrepancy in accuracy when determining the fertile window between the rhythm method and standard days method.

When evaluated against Natural Cycles' algorithm, the probability of receiving a wrong non-fertile day was 69% lower when using Natural Cycles' algorithm than with the Rhythm Method and 97% lower than with the Standard Days Method.

"While the accuracy of determining the fertile window differed, so did the number of non-fertile days provided across methods," adds Berglund. While the Natural Cycles app and the standard days method delivered a similar number of non-fertile days-56 percent and 58 percent on average-the rhythm method provided just 17 percent of non-fertile days over the course of 12 months, according to the study.

"So, what does all of this mean?" asks Berglund. Success across all methods, she explains, "relies on having a low rate of wrongly attributing fertile days as non-fertile, and giving as many non-fertile days as possible but without compromising to the extent that women preventing pregnancy can have unprotected sex when not fertile, and women planning a pregnancy can isolate their fertile window as much as possible."

She continues, saying, "Given the findings, and, in particular, in light of the discrepancies between methods, it's important that women make an informed decision when determining whether digital birth control or a period tracker is right for them and their needs."

This study marks the seventh time Natural Cycles' research was published in a peer-reviewed publication. The company's dedicated research team will be releasing additional studies in 2020.

CONTACT:

Caroline Hunter
Web Presence, LLC
+1 7862338220

SOURCE: Web Presence, LLC

ReleaseID: 570844

Insurance expert and agency owner John Craig explains the role of elevation certificates in buying, selling, building, and insuring properties.

FREEHOLD, NJ / ACCESSWIRE /  December 19, 2019 / Used to document a building's location, lowest point of elevation, and other characteristics, an elevation certificate is primarily used to help determine flood insurance rates, and to enforce local building ordinances. That's according to John Craig, an insurance agency owner and Allstate Corporation representative from New Jersey, as he explains more about these important building certifications.

"As defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, an elevation certificate is a document that lists a building's location, flood zone, lowest point of elevation, and other characteristics," explains insurance agency owner Craig. "Elevation certificates are used," he adds, "to enforce local building ordinances as well as to help determine flood insurance rates."

Craig is, he says, often asked by clients when an elevation certificate is needed. "If your property is deemed to be at a high risk of flooding, you'll probably need to obtain an elevation certificate before you can purchase flood insurance," reveals the expert, who's from the Monmouth County borough of Freehold, New Jersey.

An elevation certificate, Craig goes on to explain, outlines how a property's elevation compares to the so-called base flood elevation on a flood map. Properties that sit at the base flood elevation, he says, are considered to have a one percent chance of flooding each year. "A property's lowest point of elevation," Craig adds, "is therefore compared to the base flood elevation in order to help determine its flood risk, which, in turn, decides how much you'll pay for an appropriate flood insurance policy."

According to John Craig, it's also important to remember to apply for a new elevation certificate whenever significant changes are made to a property which are likely to alter its lowest point of elevation, and, as a result, its flood risk. "Converting a garage into livable space or building an addition, for example, may affect your home's lowest point of elevation, so it's important to keep in mind," adds the insurance expert.

Elevation certificates can be obtained from existing owners when purchasing a property, or from builders-who are often required to obtain an elevation certificate during the course of their work-in the case of new builds.

"Alternatively, if a community participates in the National Flood Insurance Program, a floodplain manager at the local municipal office should be able to assist, and can find out whether the appropriate certification is already on file or not," adds insurance agency owner John Craig. Where the appropriate certification is missing or outdated, a professional land surveyor can evaluate a property and complete a new or updated elevation certificate, according to the expert.

Not every property needs an elevation certificate. "You can check a property on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's flood maps to help determine whether an elevation certificate is needed," suggests Craig.

"Keep in mind, however, that all properties are at some risk of flooding," he adds, wrapping up, "so it may be a sensible idea to consider purchasing flood insurance even if you're not necessarily required to do so."

John Craig is a New Jersey native and Allstate Corporation representative from the county seat of Monmouth County, Freehold. A graduate of Rider University in Lawrence Township, New Jersey, Craig established his business in 2018. When the insurance agency owner is not at work, he enjoys spending time with his family, exercising, and watching the New York Rangers. To find out more about John Craig, visit https://bit.ly/johnatallstate or call 732-294-4847.

CONTACT:

Caroline Hunter
Web Presence, LLC
+1 7862338220

SOURCE: Web Presence, LLC

ReleaseID: 570845

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 19, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.

Sealed Air Corporation (NYSE:SEE)

If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/sealed-air-corporation-loss-submission-form?prid=4970&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 31, 2019
Class Period: November 5, 2014 to August 6, 2018

Allegations against SEE include that: (a) Sealed Air had hired its auditor, E&Y, pursuant to a conflicted and improper process and in order to help facilitate defendants' efforts to engage in accounting fraud; (b) Sealed Air's deduction of $1.49 billion in connection with the Settlement was indefensible and done for the improper purpose of artificially inflating the Company's financial results; (c) Sealed Air had artificially inflated its earnings, cash flows, and operating income during the Class Period; (d) as a result of the above, Sealed Air's Class Period financial statements were materially false and misleading and not prepared in conformance with GAAP; and (e) as a result of the above, Sealed Air's statements regarding its financial results, business, and prospects were materially misleading.

iRobot Corporation (NASDAQ:IRBT)

If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/irobot-corporation-loss-submission-form?prid=4970&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 23, 2019
Class Period: November 21, 2016 to October 22, 2019

The filed complaint alleges that defendants misrepresented the reason for iRobot's acquisitions of Tokyo-based Sales on Demand Corporation and privately-held Robopolis SAS, which was to control the Company's largest distributors so that defendants could inflate sales and revenue figures by stuffing the channel. Defendants further misled investors by repeatedly telling them throughout the Class Period that the Company was seeing continued double-digit revenue growth, and by attributing the growth to increased demand for the Roomba vacuums, when in reality defendants were engaging in channel-stuffing to artificially boost sales. Defendants also misstated that the Company's channel inventory levels had not changed and would not change dramatically from quarter to quarter or year over year, when in fact iRobot was deliberately stuffing the channel in order to claim false revenue growth.

Canopy Growth Corporation (NYSE:CGC)

If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/canopy-growth-corporation-loss-submission-form?prid=4970&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 20, 2020
Class Period: June 21, 2019 to November 13, 2019

Allegations against CGC include that: (1) the Company was experiencing weak demand for its softgel and oil products; (2) as a result, the Company would be forced to take a CA$32.7 million restructuring charge due to poor sales, excessive returns, and excess inventory; and (3) as a result, Defendants' statements about its business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email vw@wongesq.com or by telephone at 212.425.1140.

Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: vw@wongesq.com

SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong

ReleaseID: 570842

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 19, 2019 / The securities litigation law firm of The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice on behalf of shareholders in the following publicly traded companies. Shareholders who purchased shares in the following companies during the dates listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible Lead Plaintiff appointment. Appointment as Lead Plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery.

Resideo Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:REZI)

Investors Affected : October 29, 2018 – October 22, 2019

A class action has commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in Resideo Technologies, Inc. The filed complaint alleges that defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) the negative operational effects of the Company's spin-off from Honeywell International Inc. were more substantial and persistent than disclosed and had negatively affected Resideo’s product sales, supply chain, and gross margins, putting the Company’s FY19 financial forecasts at risk; and (b) as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s financial guidance lacked a reasonable basis and the Company was not on track to make its FY19 guidance as claimed.

Shareholders may find more information at https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/resideo-technologies-inc-loss-submission-form/?id=4971&from=1

Plantronics, Inc. (NYSE:PLT)

Investors Affected : July 2, 2018 – November 5, 2019

A class action has commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in Plantronics, Inc. The filed complaint alleges that defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company had engaged in channel stuffing to artificially boost sales; (2) the Company’s internal control over inventory levels was not effective; (3) the Company had not adequately monitored inventory levels ahead of multiple product launches, where the new models would displace demand for aging products; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Shareholders may find more information at https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/plantronics-inc-loss-submission-form/?id=4971&from=1

Aurora Cannabis Inc. (NYSE:ACB)

Investors Affected : September 11, 2019 – November 14, 2019

A class action has commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in Aurora Cannabis Inc. The filed complaint alleges that defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) as opposed to the Company’s representations, Aurora’s revenue would decline in its first quarter of fiscal 2020 ended September 30, 2019; (2) the Company would halt construction on its Aurora Nordic 2 and Aurora Sun facilities; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ statements about its business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Shareholders may find more information at https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/aurora-cannabis-inc-loss-submission-form/?id=4971&from=1

The Gross Law Firm is committed to ensuring that companies adhere to responsible business practices and engage in good corporate citizenship. The firm seeks recovery on behalf of investors who incurred losses when false and/or misleading statements or the omission of material information by a Company lead to artificial inflation of the Company's stock. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:
The Gross Law Firm
15 West 38th Street, 12th floor
New York, NY, 10018
Email: dg@securitiesclasslaw.com
Phone: (212) 537-9430
Fax: (833) 862-7770

SOURCE: The Gross Law Firm

ReleaseID: 570843

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 19, 2019 / The securities litigation law firm of The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice on behalf of shareholders in the following publicly traded companies. Shareholders who purchased shares in the following companies during the dates listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible Lead Plaintiff appointment. Appointment as Lead Plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery.

Uniti Group Inc. (NASDAQGS:UNIT)

Investors Affected : April 20, 2015 – February 15, 2019

A class action has commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in Uniti Group Inc. The filed complaint alleges that defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Uniti's financial results were not sustainable because its customer Windstream had defaulted on its unsecured notes; and (ii) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' statements about Uniti's business, operations, and prospects, were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.

Shareholders may find more information at https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/uniti-group-inc-loss-submission-form/?id=4969&from=1

Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX)

Investors Affected : February 21, 2019 – October 23, 2019

A class action has commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in Baxter International Inc. The filed complaint alleges that defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) certain intra-Company transactions, undertaken for the purpose of generating foreign exchange gains and losses, used foreign exchange rate conventions that were not in accordance with GAAP and enabled intra-Company transactions to be undertaken after the related exchange rates were already known; (2) the Company lacked effective internal control over financial reporting; (3) as a result, the Company's financial statements were misstated and would likely require correction or amendment; (4) due to the Company's internal investigation, Baxter would not be able to file its quarterly report for the period ending September 30, 2019, with the SEC on Form 10-Q in a timely manner; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' statements about the Company's business and operations lacked a reasonable basis.

Shareholders may find more information at https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/baxter-international-inc-loss-submission-form/?id=4969&from=1

Energy Transfer LP (NYSE:ET)

Investors Affected : February 25, 2017 – November 11, 2019

A class action has commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in Energy Transfer LP. The filed complaint alleges that defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Energy Transfer's permits to conduct the Mariner East pipeline project in Pennsylvania were secured via bribery and/or other improper conduct; (ii) the foregoing misconduct increased the risk that the Partnership and/or certain of its employees would be subject to government and/or regulatory action, thereby depreciating the Partnership's unit value; and (iii) as a result, the Partnership's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

Shareholders may find more information at https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/energy-transfer-lp-loss-submission-form/?id=4969&from=1

The Gross Law Firm is committed to ensuring that companies adhere to responsible business practices and engage in good corporate citizenship. The firm seeks recovery on behalf of investors who incurred losses when false and/or misleading statements or the omission of material information by a Company lead to artificial inflation of the Company's stock. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:

The Gross Law Firm
15 West 38th Street, 12th floor
New York, NY, 10018
Email: dg@securitiesclasslaw.com
Phone: (212) 537-9430
Fax: (833) 862-7770

SOURCE: The Gross Law Firm

ReleaseID: 570839

VANCOUVER, BC / ACCESSWIRE / December 19, 2019 / Experion Holdings Ltd. (TSXV:EXP)(OTCQB:EXPFF)(FRANKFURT:MB31) is pleased to report and update further to past news releases involving the litigation launched by Stephen Serenas and Pacific Executive Capital Corp. (the "Plaintiffs') against Experion, its wholly-owned subsidiary Experion Biotechnologies Inc. ("Biotechnologies"), and others.

By means of a comprehensive settlement agreement reached between the Plaintiffs and Experion (including Biotechnologies), all of the Plaintiffs claims in the litigation against Experion and Biotechnologies Inc. have been fully settled and resolved.

About Experion Holdings Ltd.

Experion Holdings Ltd. is the parent company of Experion Biotechnologies Inc., a Health Canada licensed cultivator and processor of Cannabis, based in Mission, BC.

Experion Holdings Ltd. is invested in a portfolio of products to address a wide spectrum of consumer needs' including Adult-use, Wellness and Therapeutic, and Medical products.

Experion trades on the TSX Venture Exchange as a Tier 1 issuer under the symbol "EXP" on the OTCQB Venture under the symbol "EXPFF" and on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol "MB31"

For further information, please visit the Company's website www.experionwellness.com or join our Global Investor Forum on 8020 http://connects.company/ExperionEXP where you can read all press releases or contact Investor Relations, Phone: (604) 340-3621, Email: IR@experionwellness.com,

Disclosure

This press release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws. Although the Company believes that such information is reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct.

Forward looking information is typically identified by words such as: believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, forecast, postulate and similar expressions, or are those, which, by their nature, refer to future events. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking information provided by the Company are not guarantees of future results or performance, and that actual results may differ materially from those in forward looking information as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to: the state of the financial markets for the Company's equity securities; recent market volatility; the Company's ability to raise the necessary capital or to be fully able to implement its business strategies; the risks identified in the Filing Statement, and other risks and factors that the Company is unaware of at this time. The reader is referred to the Filing Statement dated September 25, 2017 and/or the most recent annual and interim Management's Discussion and Analysis for a more complete discussion of such risk factors and their potential effects, copies of which may be accessed through the Company page on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

SOURCE: Experion Holdings Ltd.

ReleaseID: 570832

MIAMI, FL / ACCESSWIRE / December 19, 2019 / Global PoleTrusion Group Corp. (OTC PINK:GPGC) and TransPacific Energy (TPE) have terminated their joint venture agreement to develop renewable energy projects worldwide. The companies have decided to continue managing their projects independently.

"GPGC continues to focus on increasing shareholder value by developing clean energy projects that will generate continuous streams of revenue for the long term. We are currently finalizing the financing for our biomass energy project in Panama and look forward to its successful completion," stated Ramiro Guerrero, President and CEO of GPGC.

About Global PoleTrusion Group Corp.

GPGC is an engineering firm that fulfills the needs of telecommunications and utility companies, providing composite poles, towers and renewable energy solutions. Their composite structures outperform their steel, wood and concrete counterparts as they are stronger, lighter, easier to install and environmentally safe. With its advanced engineering and manufacturing capabilities, GPGC is at the forefront of providing creative and effective solutions to address the needs of
utility companies around the world.

PoleTrusion Canada provides engineering services for GPGC. They create the latest state-of-the-art composite structures, custom-designed based on the needs of their clients. The company is part of the NSERC Industrial Research Chair in Innovative Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composite Materials for Infrastructure. The chairholder, Dr. Benmokrane, is on the technical advisory board at GPGC.

To learn more about GPGC, visit www.globalpoletrusiongroup.com.

Contact:

Insa Koenies
insa.k@poletrusion.com

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains « forward-looking statements », as that term is defined in Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements in this press release that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements and include any statements regarding beliefs, plans, expectations or intentions regarding the future.

SOURCE: Global PoleTrusion Group Corp.

ReleaseID: 570703

FARMINGTON HILLS, MI / ACCESSWIRE / December 19, 2019 / No invention or development in technology has affected the legal landscape quite like the internet and, more specifically, social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Attorney Ralph Chapa says that the legal challenges and rulings surrounding social media are fascinating-and ever-evolving.

"Many people think that their social media posts, tweets, and chats are private," says Chapa, who is an experienced litigator and former president of the Association of Defense Trial Counsel. "They believe it's sufficient to have their Facebook settings locked down tightly so that only a limited number of trusted friends and family members can access the content they share. But what they fail to understand is that this content, even if it is as private as a direct message conversation, is discoverable in legal situations."

Discovery, explains Ralph Chapa, is the pre-trial process that allows all parties involved in a lawsuit to obtain relevant information from the other party or parties. This includes documents, photographs, depositions or interviews with anyone involved, and, in recent decades, all content posted to social media sites, including content that has been deleted.

"It may seem surprising that courts can subpoena Facebook, for example, to recover deleted posts or even material that is password-protected," says Ralph Chapa. That means individuals, companies, agencies, and all other entities that utilize social media need to be very cautious about what they post. Anything shared online has the potential to be recovered and used against them in a court of law.

Ralph Chapa offers some advice for using social media in a way that safeguards privacy.

Never share anything online that you would not want to be publicly disseminated. Most people understand that personal and financial information, such as Social Security numbers, bank account details, and home addresses should never be shared. But the same policy applies to anything that might be incriminating: complaints or potentially slanderous comments about an employer, photographic evidence of illegal activity such as drug use or the sale of illicit items, and the details of financial transactions like business deals or real estate agreements. If you would not want content to be seen by your HR rep, your grandmother, your children, or your neighbors and acquaintances, keep it off social platforms.

Businesses that use social media for marketing and advertising purposes should also exercise extreme caution when dealing with customers, clients, and anyone who has the potential to become a customer or client. Details of transactions, credit card information and the like should never be shared, even in a so-called "private message."

"A seemingly innocent detail posted at the time of a transaction can appear incriminatory when viewed in the light of litigation months or years after the disputed event," warns Ralph Chapa.

Navigating the social environment can be tricky, especially since people are increasingly turning to social to voice opinions, troubleshoot issues with companies or services, and contacting businesses to request information. The sites themselves facilitate such contact. Facebook, for example, now immediately opens a chat window when a user clicks on a company's page and even suggests questions and inquiries that are commonly communicated.

Just as you would never write and mail a letter that included incriminating information or any content that might compromise your integrity, so too should you keep such content off your social media profiles. "Social media communication is similar to email and hard-copy letters, and thus will likely be analyzed under similar legal standards in the event of litigation," cautions Ralph Chapa.

Go ahead and wish your former classmates a happy birthday, share those cute kitten videos, or solicit recommendations for reliable mechanics, but beware anything personal.

Ralph C. Chapa, partner, Kaufman, Payton & Chapa, is an aggressive, experienced litigator. His practice concentrates on insurance coverage and commercial litigation, as well as professional, premises, products and general liability.

CONTACT:

Caroline Hunter
Web Presence, LLC
+1 7865519491

SOURCE: Web Presence, LLC

ReleaseID: 570816

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 19, 2019 / The Klein Law Firm announces that class action complaints have been filed on behalf of shareholders of the following companies. There is no cost to participate in the suit. If you suffered a loss, you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff.

Pareteum Corporation (NASDAQ:TEUM)
Class Period: December 14, 2017 to October 21, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 23, 2019

The TEUM lawsuit alleges that Pareteum Corporation made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) it was not true that the Company's purported success was the result of hyper-demand for Pareteum's unique products or exceptional service, or the Company's competent management; but, in fact, Defendants had propped up the Company's results by manipulating Pareteum's accounting for revenues, income, and the important Backlog metric; (b) Defendants had materially overstated the Company's profitability by failing to properly account for the Company's results of operations and by artificially inflating the Company's financial results; (c) it was not true that Pareteum contained even the most minimally adequate systems of internal operational or financial controls necessary to assure that Pareteum's reported financial statements were true, accurate, and/or reliable; (d) as a result, it also was not true that the Company's financial statements and reports were prepared in accordance with GAAP and SEC rules; and (e) as a result of the aforementioned adverse conditions, Defendants lacked any reasonable basis to claim that Pareteum was operating according to plan, or that Pareteum could achieve the guidance sponsored and/or endorsed by Defendants.

Learn about your recoverable losses in TEUM: http://www.kleinstocklaw.com/pslra-1/pareteum-corporation-loss-submission-form?id=4968&from=1

Zendesk, Inc. (NYSE:ZEN)
Class Period: February 6, 2019 to October 1, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 23, 2019

The ZEN lawsuit alleges that throughout the class period, Zendesk, Inc. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) Zendesk's clients had been subject to data breaches dating back to 2016; (b) Zendesk was experiencing slowing demand for its Software as a Service offerings, particularly in Germany, the United Kingdom, and Australia, due in large part to political uncertainty and China trade issues there; and (c) as a result of the foregoing, Zendesk's business metrics and financial prospects were not as strong as defendants had led the market to believe during the Class Period.

Learn about your recoverable losses in ZEN: http://www.kleinstocklaw.com/pslra-1/zendesk-inc-loss-submission-form?id=4968&from=1

Under Armour, Inc. (NYSE:UA)
Class Period: August 3, 2016 to November 1, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 6, 2020

According to the complaint, Under Armour, Inc. allegedly made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Under Armour shifted sales from quarter to quarter to appear healthier, including to keep pace with their long-running year-over-year 20% net revenue growth; (2) undisclosed to the investing public, the Company had been under investigation by and cooperating with the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission since at least July 2017; and (3) as a result, Defendants' statements about its business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Learn about your recoverable losses in UA: http://www.kleinstocklaw.com/pslra-1/under-armour-inc-loss-submission-form?id=4968&from=1

Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. If you suffered a loss during the class period and wish to obtain additional information, please contact J. Klein, Esq. by telephone at 212-616-4899 or visit the webpages provided.

J. Klein, Esq. represents investors and participates in securities litigations involving financial fraud throughout the nation. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:
J. Klein, Esq.
Empire State Building
350 Fifth Avenue
59th Floor
New York, NY 10118
jk@kleinstocklaw.com
Telephone: (212) 616-4899
Fax: (347) 558-9665
www.kleinstocklaw.com

SOURCE: The Klein Law Firm

ReleaseID: 570830

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 19, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.

Twitter, Inc. (NYSE:TWTR)

If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/twitter-inc-loss-submission-form?prid=4967&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 30, 2019
Class Period: August 6, 2019 to October 23, 2019

The filed complaint alleges that defendants engaged in a scheme to deceive the market and a course of conduct that artificially inflated Twitter's common share price and operated as a fraud or deceit on purchasers of Twitter common stock by misrepresenting the Company's operating condition and future business prospects. The scheme was perpetrated by making positive statements about Twitter's business while defendants knew, or disregarded with deliberate recklessness, certain adverse facts. When defendants' prior misrepresentations were disclosed and became apparent to the market, the price of Twitter's common stock fell precipitously.

Mylan N.V. (NASDAQ:MYL)

If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/mylan-n-v-loss-submission-form?prid=4967&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: February 14, 2020
Class Period: May 9, 2018 to May 6, 2019

Allegations against MYL include that: (1) Mylan's Morgantown facility was in significant violation of the FDA's Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations; (2) Mylan would need to engage in a massive restructuring and remediation program; (3) Mylan's North American Segment would be substantially impacted by said program, which would in turn materially impact Mylan's financial health; (3) Mylan lacked effective internal control over financial reporting; and (4) as a result of the foregoing, the Company's financial statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

UP Fintech Holding Limited (NASDAQ:TIGR)

If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/up-fintech-holding-limited-loss-submission-form?prid=4967&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 6, 2020
Class Period: all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired: (a) Fintech American Depository Shares pursuant and/or traceable to the Company's initial public offering conducted on or about March 20, 2019; or (b) Fintech securities between March 20, 2019 and May 16, 2019.

Allegations against TIGR include that: (i) Fintech was experiencing a material decrease in commissions because of a negative trend related to risk-averse investors in the market; (ii) Fintech was unable to absorb costs associated with the rapid growth of its business and its status as a publicly listed company on a U.S. exchange; (iii) Fintech was incurring significant additional expenses related to, inter alia, employee headcount and employee compensation and benefits; (iv) all of the foregoing had led to Fintech significantly increasing operating costs and expenses; and (v) as a result, the documents filed by the Company in connection with the initial public offering were materially false and/or misleading and failed to state information required to be stated therein, and the Company's Class Period statements were likewise materially false and/or misleading.

To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email vw@wongesq.com or by telephone at 212.425.1140.

Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: vw@wongesq.com

SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong

ReleaseID: 570822